.

Defense Digest

On the Pulse…Other Notable Achievements

Defense Digest, Vol. 30, No. 3, September 2024

September 1, 2024

RECOGNITION

Robert Aldrich (Scranton, PA) was recently elected to a five-year term to the Executive Board of the Pennsylvania Defense Institute. Rob has been a board member of PDI for the past eight years. With his elevation to the Executive Board, he will begin his term as PDI’s secretary and will ultimately become PDI’s president, following in the footsteps of many other Marshall Dennehey past presidents, including most recently Stuart Sostmann, Jason Banonis and Matthew Keris.

Kimberly Kanoff Berman (Fort Lauderdale, FL) was appointed treasurer of the Florida Supreme Court Historical Society at the 42nd Annual Board of Trustees meeting of the Florida Bar. 

Melanie Foreman (Philadelphia, PA) has been appointed as a Hearing Committee Member for the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. She will serve a three-year term that began on July 1, 2024, to run through June 30, 2027. Hearing Committee Members perform essential roles in Pennsylvania’s disciplinary system, chief among them to review Disciplinary Counsel’s recommended dispositions and to conduct hearings into formal charges of attorney misconduct and petitions for reinstatement. These efforts are critical to guiding the Board and the Supreme Court in their determinations. 
 
Christopher Reeser (Harrisburg, PA) appeared on Pennsylvania Cable Network (PCN) as a commentator who introduced cases that were argued before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Chris and a local plaintiff’s attorney alternated in describing the facts of a case, the procedural history, and the issues to be decided by the Court before oral argument of the case was televised on PCN.

Congratulations to Seth Schwartz (Philadelphia, PA), co-chair of our Construction Injury Litigation Practice Group, on being named a 2024 Client Service All-Star by The BTI Consulting Group. Seth is one of only 296 attorneys selected nationwide who were identified by corporate counsel for superior client service. Clients say, “Everything Seth does is very client service oriented. He makes us feel like his only client.” Learn more about Seth’s practice and approach to client service: https://lnkd.in/e-dSSArK
 

PUBLISHED ARTICLES

The Legal Intelligencer published “DOL’s Retirement Security Rule Imposes New Fiduciary Standards on Financial Services, Insurance Industries,” authored by Samuel Cohen and Ryan Friel (both of Philadelphia, PA). You can read their article here.

PLUS Blog published Dana Gittleman’s (Philadelphia, PA) article “Insurance Agents and Brokers Get No Summer Vacation from Risk Management.” You can read her article here. 

PLUS Blog published Dana Gittleman’s (Philadelphia, PA) and Jeremy Zacharias’ (Mount Laurel. NJ) article “Insurance Agent Skorrs Victory in New Jersey’s Appellate Division.” You can read this article here. 

Joslyn Restivo and Oner Kiziltan (both of Fort Lauderdale, FL) authored the article, “Florida High Court Clears Path for Insurance Companies to Utilize Payment Methodologies Enumerated in PIP Statute,” which appeared in the Daily Business Review. The article discusses the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Allstate Insurance v. Revival Chiropractic regarding the “billed amount” issue—one of the most longstanding issues in Florida PIP law. You can read their article here.

InsuranceLawGlobal.com published Alesia Sulock’s (Philadelphia, PA) article “The Assessment of Professional Liability Claims in the U.S.” You can read Alesia’s article here. 

The Legal Intelligencer published “Your Well-Being Matters: Attorney Mental Health and Professional Competence” and “‘But I Could Have Gotten More!’—Damages Speculation in Legal Malpractice Cases” by Alesia Sulock and Josh J.T. Byrne (both of Philadelphia, PA). 

David Tomeo (Roseland, NJ) and Melissa Dziak (Scranton, PA) authored the article, “Navigating a New Legal Landscape: Protecting the Corporate Veil in the Med Mal Suit,” which appeared in the New Jersey Law Journal’s Medical Malpractice Supplement. The article explores the historical roots and status of the “piercing the corporate veil” doctrine in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. You can read their article here. 

 

SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS

Mohamed Bakry (Philadelphia, PA), in his role as president of The Lawyers Club of Philadelphia, hosted a CLE, “Communications with Parties and the Court,” with Josh J.T. Byrne (Philadelphia, PA) as one of the panelists. This one-hour program was comprised of four 30-minute presentations by the panelists, followed by a discussion and Q&A from the audience. The presentations focused on how to determine whether a party is represented and specifically addressed the topic of current and former corporate employees. The discussion also included how to ethically communicate with unrepresented parties from the perspectives of an attorney and a judge.

We are proud to have two outstanding attorneys from our firm involved with DRI’s annual Diversity for Success Seminar. Mohamed Bakry (Philadelphia, PA), a member of our DE&I Committee, served as the 2024 Program Chair, and Christina Gonzales (Philadelphia PA) moderated a portion of the DRI Women of Color Roundtable discussion.

Josh J.T. Byrne (Philadelphia, PA) presented “Disciplinary and Reinstatement Cases You Should Know” at the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s training for new hearing committee members. The presentation focused on the disciplinary process from the perspective of respondent’s counsel. 

Josh J.T. Byrne and Alesia Sulock (both of Philadelphia, PA) presented for Attorney Protective on the “Ethical Use of Social Media in the Practice of Law.” The presentation attracted over 1,300 attendees.

Michele Frisbie (King of Prussia, PA) was a guest lecturer on “Avoiding Liability for Personal Trainers” at Montgomery County Community College’s Health and Fitness Professional AAS Degree and Personal Training Certificate programs.

John Gonzales (Philadelphia, PA) presented a webinar entitled “An Introduction to Fourth Amendment Police Liability Claims” for the National Academy of Continuing Legal Education. 

Sean Greenwalt (Tampa, FL), Oner Kiziltan, and Joslyn Restivo (both of Fort Lauderdale, FL) presented at the Florida Insurance Fraud Education Committee’s annual conference. Their presentation, “No Tipping, Please: Responding to Gratuitous Payment, Coverage, and Policy Disputes,” tackled all the new and old challenges to PIP exhaustion and policy limits.

Matthew Keris (Scranton, PA) joined hundreds of the country’s leading health care executives, clinicians, and other professionals at the 2024 American Hospital Association Leadership Summit. Matt co-presented the session “Multi-Disciplinary Evaluation of Liability Risks of AI in Health Care: The Board Focus,” with Susan Boisvert, Senior Patient Safety Risk Manager at The Doctors Company. The session focused on how professionals can prepare for upcoming medicolegal challenges in light of anticipated increases in AI legal spend.

Julia Klubenspies (Roseland, NJ) was a featured speaker at the new resident orientation for the first class of resident physicians at The Valley Hospital in Paramus, New Jersey. Julia spoke on “Risk Management Topics and Strategies for the Resident Physician.”

Leaders of our Trucking & Transportation Litigation Practice Group revealed the major employment law issues impacting the industry with AM Best Information Services. Leonard Leicht (Roseland, NJ), Peggy Bush (Orlando, FL), and Harold Moroknek (Westchester, NY) shared lessons learned from actual cases they have handled. Listen now! https://lnkd.in/eAG5cfxN

Harold Moroknek (Westchester, NY) was part of a group of presenters at this year’s Auto Haulers Association Spring Conference.
 
Michele Punturi (Philadelphia, PA) was joined by Michelle Leighton, Vice President - Senior Claim Consultant at Connor Strong, and Robin S. Roeder, Senior Vice President Risk Management at Sedgwick, in presenting CLM’s webinar “The Dream Team Approach to WC Case Management.” 

Jeffrey Rapattoni (Mount Laurel, NJ) spoke at the New England Chapter IASIU two-day training seminar, where he presented “Ethics and the Investigator.”

Tune in to the latest Professional Liability Underwriting Society podcast, where David Shannon and Ryan Friel (both in Philadelphia, PA) discuss the new SEC rule for cybersecurity and its impact on compliance frameworks and reporting obligations. https://lnkd.in/esBGPCDA 

Jack Slimm (Mount Laurel, NJ) joined a panel to present the New Jersey State Bar Association’s CLE program, “Legal Malpractice Update.” The seminar touched on ethical issues in legal malpractice, including claims and proofs involving the New Jersey Lawyers Fund for Client Protection, problems arising from accepting electronic payments, fee splitting and referral fees, emotional distress damages, the impact of artificial intelligence on legal malpractice, and appellate malpractice.

Robin Snyder (Philadelphia, PA) joined a panel at the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry’s Healthcare Summit to present “Navigating Medical Malpractice: Insights Into Pennsylvania’s Legal Landscape.”

Sunny Sparano (Roseland, NJ) joined a panel of fellow Insurance Law Global members to present “Navigating Liability for Design: Key Considerations for Contractors, Professionals, and Insurers.” In this webinar, the panel of construction law experts contrasted the duties imposed on design and construction practitioners in the USA, France, and Australia respectively.

Alesia Sulock (Philadelphia, PA) joined an international panel of attorneys and members of Insurance Law Global to present the webinar “The Assessment of Damages in Professional Liability Claims.” This panel of experts compared and contrasted how damages are calculated in Argentina, Australia, Italy, Spain, the UK, and the USA. Alesia also presented with the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Professional Liability Committee, “Avoiding Legal Malpractice,” to the Monroe County Bar Association.

Suzanne Utke (Philadelphia, PA) lectured on the topic of “Medical Legal Issues” for the physicians assistant programs of Thomas Jefferson University.

Timothy Ventura (Philadelphia, PA) and Christopher Block (Roseland, NJ) presented “The Seven-Ten Split Mock Trial: Navigating Agent Errors & Omissions,” at the Annual Professional Insurance Agents (PIA) Conference. The mock trial was designed to mimic a trial based on actual errors that arose under E&O liability for insurance agents. During the session, attendees were also provided with an overview of E&O liability, including an examination of how the agent could have avoided a lawsuit, and common causes of E&O claims against insurance agents.

Mark Wellman (New York, NY) hosted “AI - The Future of Litigation,” at the CLM Alliance (Claims and Litigation Management) New York City local chapter event.

Jeremy Zacharias (Mount Laurel, NJ) was a panelist for a New Jersey Institute CLE seminar entitled, “Solving Problems in Commercial Real Estate Transactions,” where he discussed 21st Century ethical considerations in commercial real estate transactions. The seminar, geared towards individuals handling commercial real estate matters, also discussed commercial real estate transactions in New Jersey and how one can craft and negotiate contracts and leases that protect your clients against excessive risk. 

Lary Zucker (Mount Laurel, NJ) joined a panel to present a webinar, “Managing Bowling & Pickelball Claims,” for the Sports and Entertainment Risk Management Alliance. This webinar provided an in-depth review of the most common risks in bowling and provided guidance on how to identify, manage, mitigate, investigate, and defend these cases. It also covered risks associated with America’s fastest-growing sport, pickleball. The panel discussed the dos and don’ts of liability and exposure. 

 

Defense Digest, Vol. 30, No. 3, September 2024, is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1. © 2024 Marshall Dennehey. All Rights Reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm. For reprints, contact tamontemuro@mdwcg.com.

Firm Highlights

blue facade of a hospital sign against blue sky

Result

Defense Verdict in Complex Medical Malpractice Trial

Result

Summary Judgment Secured, Preserving $750,000 in Coverage for Insured in Major Trucking Liability Dispute

Ray Freudiger and Michael A. Roberts (both of Cincinnati) successfully obtained summary judgment on behalf of their client in a coverage dispute arising from a May 19, 2022, motor vehicle accident. A permissive driver operated a box truck for an interstate trucking company and caused severe injuries to two tort victims. Prior to the accident, the insured had procured a commercial auto policy for the trucking company with stated limits of $1,000,000. Following the accident, the insurer initiated a declaratory judgment action asserting that only reduced bodily injury limits of $25,000/$50,000 applied and later counterclaimed, alleging it would not have insured the driver had he been properly submitted for approval under the policy. After extensive discovery, briefing, and oral argument, the court rejected the insurer’s attempt to shift responsibility for the $750,000 in coverage it was legally required to provide for permissive drivers under Ohio law, granting summary judgment in favor of the insured and preserving $750,000 in liability exposure.

News

Marshall Dennehey Again Earns Recognition in Distinguished Chambers USA

Event

29th Annual FDLA Florida Liability Claims Conference

Jim and Erica will team up to present, "Supporting the Next Generation: Connecting with Associates." This panel-style presentation will explore communication best practices from the perspective of a senior shareholder and newer associate. The discussion will focus on the communication styles of different generations and effective strategies to avoid communication breakdowns. Topics to be discussed include the hiring process, perceptions of defense work among newer lawyers, work-life balance issues after hiring, and mentoring.

Thought Leadership

U.S. Supreme Court Decides Key Issue Regarding Interstate Freight Broker Liability

Freight brokers are intermediaries.  They connect shippers of goods with trucking companies that transport those goods.  Freight brokers match a load of freight with a trucking company and oversee the logistics of the transportation. For a number of years there has been a division among the Federal Circuits regarding the potential liability of freight brokers when the trucking companies that they retain for interstate loads are involved in accidents.  At the center of this division was the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA).  Some Federal Circuit Courts have held that state law negligent hiring claims against freight brokers were preempted by the FAAAA .  Other Federal Circuits Courts have held that even if preemption applied, the “safety exception” in the FAAAA saved state law negligent hiring claims from federal preemption.  On May 14, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the conflict in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, et al, No24-1238. In that case freight broker C.H. Robinson selected Caribe Transport to haul an interstate load. The commercial truck driver employed by Caribe Transport allegedly caused an accident and the plaintiff, Montgomery, was seriously injured. Montgomery brought an action against the driver, Caribe Transport and C.H. Robinson. The allegation against C.H. Robinson was that it negligently retained Caribe Transport when it knew, or should have known, that it was an unsafe company. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that Montgomery’s claims against C.H. Robinson were preempted by the FAAAA. The plaintiff appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.  The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision focused primarily on the safety exception in the FAAAA.  That provision provides that the FAAAA preemption “…shall not restrict the safety regulatory authority of a State with respect to motor vehicles.” C.H. Robinson argued, as freight brokers historically have, that their function was not “with respect to motor vehicles” because they do not own trucks or employ drivers. They are merely intermediaries, connecting entities who need freight moved with entities who can do that job. Therefore, C.H. Robinson argued that preemption applied, not the safety exception. The U.S. Supreme Court did not accept that argument. The Court focused on the meaning of the phrase “with respect to” in the safety exception. The Court held that it means “referring to”, “concerning” or “regarding”. Therefore, writing for a unanimous Court, Justice Barrett concluded that “[r]equiring C.H. Robinson to exercise ordinary care in selecting a carrier therefore “concerns” motor vehicles—most obviously, the trucks that will transport the goods. So, Montgomery’s negligent-hiring claim falls within the FAAAA’s safety exception, which saves it from preemption.” Justice Kavanaugh, in his concurring opinion, noted the effect this ruling may have on freight brokers and their insurers throughout the country: Importantly, the Court's decision today should not be read to mean that brokers will routinely be subject to state tort liability in the wake of truck accidents. As even plaintiff's counsel stressed, brokers should be able to successfully defend against state tort suits if the brokers have acted reasonably and arranged transportation with reputable trucking companies. Tr. of Oral Arg. 27-29. In plaintiff's counsel's words, the brokers "just have to hire carriers that actually have a reasonable policy," and "the broker is not going to have a problem if it's asking the hard questions of the carrier." Id., at 42, 45. In addition, the proximate-cause requirement in typical state tort law should help protect brokers from excessive liability. Id., at 25. That said, the brokers rightly caution against naivete. In the real world, as the brokers forcefully respond, state tort law can be unpredictable, and the costs to brokers of litigation and insurance may be significant even when brokers prevail in lawsuits. Moreover, the costs of litigation and insurance, as well as the costs of brokers' conducting more substantial inquiries into trucking companies, will cascade through the economy and be paid in part by American consumers in the form of higher prices. The concerns expressed by the brokers are legitimate and weighty. The key point here is that freight brokers can no longer claim they are protected from negligent retention claims by the FAAAA (in cases involving interstate transportation). The challenge will be to determine what is considered ”reasonable efforts” used by brokers when retaining transportation companies. 

Result

No-Cause Jury Verdict Secured in Wrongful Death Trial

We successfully obtained a no-cause jury verdict in a 13-day wrongful death trial. The decedent, a 59-year-old man, was admitted to the emergency room on February 15, 2019, with complaints of abdominal pain, decreased appetite, and constipation, despite the use of laxatives. The patient did not complain of any nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. He had a significant medical history including diabetes, hypertension, prior coronary artery stenting, morbid obesity (with past gastric bypass surgery), longstanding ventral hernia, and back pain. A CT scan revealed multiple hernias and a potential closed-loop bowel obstruction, leading to a surgery consultation. Our client, an emergency general surgeon, interpreted that the patient did not have a closed loop or any significant obstruction and recommended non-surgical management. The patient was approved to have clear liquids, and had a vomiting incident shortly after, but our client was not notified. The patient was returned to NPO status, and after improving overnight, he was returned to “clears” and additional medical and renal consults were ordered. Our client did not receive any communications from the residents/nurses of any changes in the patient’s condition. On February 18, 2019, two rapid responses were called due to increased heart rate and vomiting. It is believed that the vomiting resulted in aspiration, causing sepsis, ultimately leading to the patient’s death. During the trial, the plaintiff’s sole medical expert highlighted imaging on the wrong hernia, which called into question all of his opinions in the case. We made key objections related to the expert testimony, limiting what the allegations were, and preventing new allegations from being made. After approximately two and a half hours of deliberating, the jury returned a no-cause verdict. 

graphic with Maria Granaudo photo text announces she has joined the firm as a shareholder in the Health Care Dept.

News

Maria R. Granaudo Joins Marshall Dennehey’s Wilmington Office As a Shareholder in the Health Care Department

Thought Leadership

PA Middle District Dismisses Claims Against School District and its Superintendent, Principal, Special Education Director, and Classroom Teacher

A five-year-old special education student was enrolled in the Wyoming Valley West School District and attended the State Street Elementary School during the 2024-2025 school year. The student refused to clean up classroom toys at dismissal. When his teacher allegedly grabbed him by the wrist to walk him back to his seat, the student dropped to the floor and began crying. The teacher then allegedly grabbed the student by the ankle and dragged him across the floor. Following an investigation, criminal charges were not advanced by the county DA, and the school permitted the teacher to return to the classroom. The student’s parents sued, lodging thirteen legal counts under both state and federal law, which sought monetary damages from the teacher, the school district, the superintendent, the principal, and the director of special education. The plaintiff’s 42 USC 1983 claims were dismissed as to the school district for failure to allege a policy or custom violation, and the failure to alleged deliberate indifference in the failure-to-train context. As to the superintendent, building principal, and special education director, the Section 1983 claims were also dismissed for failure to allege personal involvement on the part of the individuals. Regarding an equal protection claim asserted against all defendants, the motion to dismiss was also granted for a failure to advance a plausible equal protection claim, holding that “plaintiffs' single-act allegations do not include a factual basis to even infer that the act was motivated by discriminatory animus rather than some other non-discriminatory impulse.” The court further dismissed the plaintiff’s negligence-based claims including negligence against the teacher and district administrators, NIED, and vicarious liability under the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act (PSTCA). The federal claims under the IDEA, Section 504, and the ADA were also dismissed in various respects. The IDEA claim was dismissed against all defendants with prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Section 504 claims against the individual defendants were also dismissed with prejudice, as districts, not individuals, are the recipients of federal funds under Section 504. However, the Section 504 and ADA claims were dismissed without prejudice as to defendant Wyoming Valley West, and the plaintiff was permitted leave to amend.

News

Christina Gonzales To Speak at the Women of Color Roundtable at DRI’s Diversity and Inclusion Seminar

Thought Leadership

Marijuana Legalization and Workplace Risk: What New Jersey Employers Need to Know

While the legalization of recreational marijuana usage poses a risk of increased work-related accidents for younger workers, employers can work to curb this increase by investing in education, effective drug policies, and employee assistance programs.