.

Defense Digest

On the Pulse…Other Notable Achievements

Defense Digest, Vol. 31, No. 3, September 2025

September 1, 2025

THOUGHT LEADERSHIP

Dana Gittleman (Philadelphia, PA), chair of our Real Estate E&O Practice Group, and Jeremy Zacharias (Mount Laurel, NJ) kicked off their Professional Liability Underwriting Society (PLUS) podcast series with “Insurance Agent E&O – Top Ten Tips for Risk Management.” From memorializing communications to protecting attorney-client privilege, Dana and Jeremy share practical strategies to help insurance professionals manage risk more effectively. Tune in! https://lnkd.in/eQGs3u2y

David Shannon (Philadelphia, PA), chair of our Privacy and Data Security Practice Group, and guest Evgueni Erchov from Cypfer, recorded the Professional Liability Underwriting Society (PLUS) podcast “Managing Cybersecurity Threats in 2025.” This is the third season of David’s ongoing podcast with PLUS. The program focused on ransomware, business-email compromise, AI, and the increasing sophistication of cyber-threat actors. Tune in today! https://plusweb.org/podcast/managing-cybersecurity-threats-in-2025-episode-1/. 


 

SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS

Kimberly Berman (Fort Lauderdale, FL) spoke at the 28th Annual Florida Defense Lawyers Association (FLDA) Liability Claims Conference about “Pleading, Proof, and Preservation of Punitive Damages Claims: Tips for Florida Trial Lawyers and Appellate Attorneys.”

Ryan Burns, Angie Colorado, and A.C. Nash (all in Fort Lauderdale, FL) presented “Relevant Procedural Rule Changes for Risk Managers” at the Tampa Bay RIMS (Risk & Insurance Management Society) educational luncheon. This program provided an insightful overview of the procedural changes in the Florida circuit court system. The discussion shed light on the impact of the Florida tort reform of 2023, aligning the state’s court procedures with those of the Federal court. These changes are set to influence the way lawsuits are handled, introducing strict timelines throughout the process.

Josh J.T. Byrne (Philadelphia, PA) was a panelist at the Philadelphia Bar Associations’ webcast, “Ethics and Legal Malpractice Avoidance.” Josh is Co-Chair of the Bar’s Professional Responsibility and Guidance Committee. Josh also co-presented “Ethics Hotline and Special Ethical Considerations for Prosecutors,” at District Attorney’s Office: August CLE Program hosted by the Philadelphia Bar Association.

James Cole and Alec DelConte (both of Philadelphia, PA) presented “Untying Tangled Titles: How Property Deed Fraud Drives Costs and Indemnity,” at the annual conference of the International Association of Special Investigation Units. 

Christopher Conrad (Harrisburg, PA) and Lee Durivage (Philadelphia, PA) presented “Hot Topics in Employment Law,” for the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Law Firm Administrators’ Conference of Central Pennsylvania. Their presentation, which was attended by law firm administrators, human resources staff, and managing attorneys, focused on the current employment law issues facing law firms and practical advice for managing risk.

Michael Duffy (King of Prussia, PA) presented as part of the Pennsylvania Bar Institute’s and Pennsylvania Bar Association Workers’ Compensation Law Section’s conference Tough Problems in Workers’ Compensation 2025. Mike was part of a panel that presented “Surveillance and Using Social Media to Win Your Case.” Designed specifically by and for the experienced workers’ compensation practitioner, this presentation highlighted select challenges in workers’ compensation practice and offered techniques for managing them. Developments, practices, strategies, and preferences were discussed to help avoid making mistakes that could negatively affect a client’s claim.

Christina Gonzales (Philadelphia, PA) served as moderator for a panel at the 2025 Defense Research Institute’s Diversity for Success Expo, titled “Building Your Book of Business with Brand YOU! (Pitching Business and Executive Branding).” The discussion explored how developing a personal brand and growing a book of business are essential strategies for standing out—both within your organization and across the legal profession. Panelists shared practical insights on how to balance client development with professional responsibilities, offering guidance on how legal professionals can define their value, build meaningful relationships, and pursue long-term success—whether in a law firm, in-house role, or independent practice.

Gregory Graham (Pittsburgh, PA) presented “AI Litigation: The Current Landscape,” at the Pennsylvania Defense Institute’s annual CLE and Conference. This seminar focused on the current landscape of liability claims stemming from the use of generative and agentic AI. While generative AI is more commonly discussed at this point in time, it is agentic AI—particularly its end-to-end automated goal identification and action initiation—that is going to profoundly impact our clients’ industries.

Sean Greenwalt and Amara Rodriguez (both of Tampa, FL) spoke at the 28th Annual Florida Defense Lawyers (FDLA) Association Liability Claims Conference about effective use of proposals for settlement in Florida’s new legal landscape.

Matthew Keris (Scranton, PA) presented “MPL Crossfire: How to Prepare for AI From a Medico-Legal Perspective,” at the 2024 Medical Professional Liability Association conference. Matt also presented two seminars at the Hospital Insurance Forum 2025 Conference. For the first seminar, Matt co-presented with Jill Huntley Taylor. Their presentation discussed “New Jury Considerations in the Age of Big Law, Verdicts, and Medicine.” One day later, Matt presented “AI in Healthcare: Views from a Clinical and Legal Perspective.” Finally, Matt joined a panel presentation for a webinar put on by the Pennsylvania Coalition for Civil Justice Reform. The program, “Medical Malpractice Pennsylvania Update,” explored a number of emerging issues in medical malpractice, including the continuing surge of Philadelphia cases; dilution of plaintiffs’ burden to prove that an agent causes harm; preservation of issues on appeal and waiver rulings of Superior Court; ethical concerns of double and triple booking; and the rise of punitive damages. 

Paul Krepps (Pittsburgh, PA) spoke at the Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association Conference and Training Session on “Litigation After-Action – Lessons from the Perspective of a Defense Lawyer.” 

Missy Minehan (Harrisburg, PA) presented “Mitigating and Responding to a Professional Liability Claim: Documentation, Discovery, and Depositions” during the Skilled Nursing Development Institute’s administrator appreciation event. Missy discussed pre-suit documentation issues, including documentation of arbitration agreements, missing medical records documentation and maintenance of key paper records (e.g. staffing, deployment, statements), and intra-lawsuit discovery and depositions.

Megan Nelson (Orlando, FL) presented “The Latest on Medical AI and Liability Claims,” at the Florida Society for Healthcare Risk Management and Patient Safety’s annual meeting and education conference.

Jeffrey Rapattoni (Mount Laurel, NJ) presented “Ethics and the Investigator,” at the conference of the Illinois Chapter of IASIU (International Association of Special Investigation Units Inc.). Jeff also spoke at the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud’s Mid-Year Meeting, participating in the panel “Insurance Fraud Through a Legal Lens: Insights from the Frontlines.” At the annual conference of the International Association of Special Investigation Units, Jeff made two presentations, “Legal Update: Emerging Legal Issues in Fraud Fighting,” and “Ethics.”

Jack Slimm and Jeremy Zacharias (both of Mount Laurel, NJ) presented at the Camden County Bar Association Annual Civil Practice Update. Jack covered recent case law updates within New Jersey, and Jeremy moderated the panel discussion, which was also presented by the Honorable Steven J. Polansky, as well as several private practitioners. This annual seminar is well attended and has been a staple within the Camden County Bar Association for over two decades.

Jack Slimm was also a featured speaker at the annual New Jersey Institute for Continuing Legal Education seminar “Legal Malpractice Update.” Jack and Appellate Judge, Harry Carroll, presented “Rule 104 Hearings Regarding Experts In Legal Malpractice Actions.”

Jeremy Zacharias also presented at an all-day CLE for the New Jersey State Bar Association on “Solving Problems in Commercial Real Estate Transactions.” Jeremy’s topic included a discussion on ethical considerations in commercial real estate transactions. Jeremy covered topics including pitfalls using artificial intelligence with commercial real estate transactions, as well as the applicability of the Rules of Professional Conduct in representing clients. 


PUBLISHED WORKS

August 18, 2025 – Todd Leon and Alec DelConte (both of Philadelphia, PA) published an article in The Legal Intelligencer’s Insurance Law Supplement. Titled, “Choice of Law in Coverage Disputes: What Happens When the Policy, the Loss and the Parties Span State Lines?,” the article explores how “choice of law” issues arise in litigation, using a Pennsylvania–New Jersey insurance dispute scenario to highlight the significant impact differing state laws can have on insurers and policyholders. Read their article here.

August 1, 2025 – Alana Staniszewski’s (Pittsburgh, PA) article “Pa. Supreme Court Permits Payment of Specific Loss Benefits to a Deceased Injured Workers’ Estate,” was published in The Legal Intelligencer. Read her article here.

July 28, 2025 – PLUS Blog published “Navigating the Doctrine of Reasonable Expectations: A Liability Risk for Insurance Agents,” by Dana Gittleman (Philadelphia, PA). Read her article here.

July 21, 2025 – The Legal Intelligencer published Alesia Sulock and Josh J.T. Byrne’s (both of Philadelphia, PA) article “Socially Responsible Lawyers: Why You Need to Understand Social Media to Competently Represent Your Clients, Part 2.” You can read this article here.

July 11, 2025 – William Murphy (Roseland, NJ) authored the article “Medical Marijuana in New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Law,” appearing in the New Jersey Law Journal’s Cannabis Supplement. The article discusses developments since the 2021 Hager decision (Vincent Hager v. M&K Construction, 246 N.J. 1 (2021), and recent shifts in the legal landscape as state and federal laws have evolved with regard to medical marijuana. You can read the article here

June 20, 2025 – Mark Wellman (New York, NY) was published in CLM Construction Claims Magazine – Summer Edition as a co-author of the article “Danger: Construction Site. Avoiding Liability & Workers’ Compensation Exposure in the Construction Industry.” The article explores key strategies for mitigating risk and managing claims in the high-stakes world of construction. You can read this article here.

June 17, 2025 – Jacob Gilboy’s (Harrisburg, PA) article “Employment Discrimination and Retaliation – Best Practices to Avoid Headaches,” was published in PLUS Blog. Employment discrimination and retaliation claims can disrupt even the most well-run organizations. In this article, Jake shares five practical tips for navigating these situations without making them worse! Read it now on the Professional Liability Underwriting Society (PLUS) blog

June 10, 2025 – Ryan Friel (Philadelphia, PA) authored the article, “Proposed FINRA Rule 3290—A Regulatory Breakthrough or a Halfhearted Attempt at Real Reform?,” appearing in The Legal Intelligencer. The article questions if the proposed rule is truly a modernization of outdated regulations or merely a cosmetic update that fails to address the core concerns of broker-dealers and their registered representatives. Read here.

May 19, 2025 – Josh J.T. Byrne and Alesia Sulock (both of Philadelphia, PA) authored “The Barrier to Legal Malpractice Cases Arising Out of Class Action Settlements,” published in The Legal Intelligencer. Josh and Alesia explore a recent Delaware Supreme Court decision which examines why it is appropriate to have high barriers to legal malpractice actions after a class action settlement. You can read their article here.

May 2025 – Michele Punturi (Philadelphia, PA) co-authored, with clients, the article “Danger: High Risk Ahead – Managing Workers’ Comp Exposure in Risky Industries,” appearing in CLM Magazine. The article discusses best workers’ compensation claims management practices for high-risk sectors including construction, health care, transportation, and retail and hospitality. You can read the article here


 

RECOGNITION

Jason Banonis (King of Prussia, PA) has been elected to the Board of Governors of the Bowie State University Maguire Academy for Risk Management and Insurance. He will also serve on its Education, Curriculum, and Program Committee. The Academy is affiliated with the Saint Joseph’s University Maguire Academy of Insurance & Risk Management, which was created by Saint Joseph’s alumnus James J. Maguire, founder and longtime CEO of the Philadelphia Insurance Company. Its purpose is to promote and support education in insurance, risk management, and actuarial science and offers services to its students, including scholarships, internships and co-op experiences, counseling, and assistance with career placement. Current academy board members include executives from global insurance companies and corporate risk managers.

James Hanratty (Jacksonville, FL) and Alesia Sulock (Philadelphia, PA) have been admitted to membership of the International Association of Defense Counsel. The IADC is an invitation-only, peer-reviewed association that has served a prestigious membership of corporate insurance executives and insurance defense attorneys since 1920. Its members include many of the world’s foremost corporate and insurance lawyers, as well as leading insurance executives.

Ryan Hauck (Pittsburgh, PA) was recently elected by his peers to serve a two-year term as a Council Member on the Allegheny County Bar Association Workers’ Compensation Section Committee. 

Blake Hood (Jacksonville, FL) was recently appointed as co-chair of the Jacksonville Bar Association’s Social Security/Workers’ Compensation Committee. 

Marshall Dennehey has once again been recognized as a leader in client service, earning a spot on BTI Consulting’s Client Service A-Team 2025, which honors law firms delivering the highest levels of service to corporate clients. Based exclusively on feedback from corporate counsel, the firm ranked as a “Stand Out” among all law firms nationwide, affirming our continued strength in building trusted relationships, understanding client goals, and delivering consistent, results-driven service. The BTI Client Service A-Team is the only law firm ranking based solely on direct, unprompted feedback from legal decision-makers at large companies. The 2025 report is based on more than 350 in-depth interviews conducted between May 2024 and February 2025 with general counsel, chief legal officers, and their direct reports. To learn more, visit BTI’s Client Service A-Team, at https://bticonsulting.com/bti-client-service-a-team. 


 

Defense Digest, Vol. 31, No. 3, September 2025, is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1. © 2025 Marshall Dennehey. All Rights Reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm. For reprints, contact tamontemuro@mdwcg.com.

Firm Highlights

Result

No-Cause Jury Verdict Secured in Wrongful Death Trial

We successfully obtained a no-cause jury verdict in a 13-day wrongful death trial. The decedent, a 59-year-old man, was admitted to the emergency room on February 15, 2019, with complaints of abdominal pain, decreased appetite, and constipation, despite the use of laxatives. The patient did not complain of any nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. He had a significant medical history including diabetes, hypertension, prior coronary artery stenting, morbid obesity (with past gastric bypass surgery), longstanding ventral hernia, and back pain. A CT scan revealed multiple hernias and a potential closed-loop bowel obstruction, leading to a surgery consultation. Our client, an emergency general surgeon, interpreted that the patient did not have a closed loop or any significant obstruction and recommended non-surgical management. The patient was approved to have clear liquids, and had a vomiting incident shortly after, but our client was not notified. The patient was returned to NPO status, and after improving overnight, he was returned to “clears” and additional medical and renal consults were ordered. Our client did not receive any communications from the residents/nurses of any changes in the patient’s condition. On February 18, 2019, two rapid responses were called due to increased heart rate and vomiting. It is believed that the vomiting resulted in aspiration, causing sepsis, ultimately leading to the patient’s death. During the trial, the plaintiff’s sole medical expert highlighted imaging on the wrong hernia, which called into question all of his opinions in the case. We made key objections related to the expert testimony, limiting what the allegations were, and preventing new allegations from being made. After approximately two and a half hours of deliberating, the jury returned a no-cause verdict. 

Thought Leadership

Pennsylvania Superior Court Reaffirms Liberal Pleading Standard in Medical Malpractice Actions

Legal Roundup: Pennsylvania The Pennsylvania Superior Court has reinforced a broader fact-pleading approach that may make it more difficult for health care defendants to obtain dismissal at the preliminary objection stage. In DaSilva v. Abington Memorial Hospital, the court held that the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint satisfied Pennsylvania’s fact‑pleading requirements despite the absence of individually named negligent actors. In DaSilva, the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint alleging that Abington Memorial Hospital was directly and vicariously negligent after the patient, who was experiencing a mental health crisis, was left unattended by hospital staff, exited the emergency department, and was struck by a vehicle, suffering serious injuries. The trial court sustained the hospital’s preliminary objections and dismissed the complaint with prejudice, stating plaintiffs “failed to plead any material factual allegations in support of their claims of negligence [and] set forth vague allegations of negligence and unidentified agency.” Id. at *5. The plaintiffs appealed. On appeal, the Superior Court reversed, holding that the complaint sufficiently pled negligence and vicarious liability claims under Pa.R.C.P. 1019(a). The court concluded that allegations describing the patient’s condition, the hospital’s awareness of that condition, and the alleged failure to monitor or prevent elopement were adequate to satisfy Pennsylvania’s pleading requirements. Significantly, the court rejected the hospital’s argument that the complaint failed because it did not identify the specific employees responsible for the alleged negligence. Instead, the court found that generalized references to “emergency room staff” were sufficient to place the hospital on notice of the claims because “the names of those who performed services for the plaintiff are known to the defendant or can be ascertained during discovery.” Id. at *12 (citing Est. of Denmark ex rel. Hurst v. Williams, 117 A.3d 300, 307 (Pa. Super. 2015)). The effect of DaSilva is that plaintiffs may proceed past the pleading stage with relatively generalized allegations, particularly in cases involving institutional defendants where relevant details are uniquely within the defendant’s control. As a result, health care defendants should anticipate that challenges to claim sufficiency may be resolved in the later stages of litigation, including discovery and summary judgment.

Thought Leadership

The Ohio Supreme Court Extends Sham-Affidavit Rule to Contradictory Expert Reports

Legal Roundup: Ohio In its June 23, 2026, decision in Moore v. Mercy Medical Center, the Ohio Supreme Court upheld a trial court’s decision to strike an expert witness’s affidavit that contradicted the opinions expressed in the expert’s prior report. This case pertains to allegations of medical malpractice after plaintiff Cheri Moore gave birth to an infant in respiratory distress who required intubation. Moore alleged that a delay in ordering an emergency cesarean section resulted in the need for intubation, causing her child’s injuries. Specifically, Moore sued Dr. Meniru, who completed his first shift at 7:00 a.m. on May 28, 2015, and did not resume treating Moore until 7:00 a.m. on May 29, 2015. One of Moore’s expert witnesses authored a report stating that the doctors, including Dr. Meniru, deviated from the standard of care by not advocating for a cesarean section in the evening of May 28, 2015. Based on this report, Dr. Meniru moved for summary judgment, arguing that the alleged breach occurred during a period when he was not on duty. In response to the summary judgment motion, the plaintiff filed an affidavit from the same expert. Although the expert expressly incorporated his previous report into his affidavit, he also offered an additional opinion: that Dr. Meniru breached the standard of care by failing to begin a cesarean section within 30 minutes of receiving reports of fetal distress. Dr. Meniru filed a motion to strike the expert’s affidavit, arguing that it contradicted the opinions set forth in his prior report in violation of the sham-affidavit rule. The sham-affidavit rule applies to “a contradictory affidavit that indicates only that the affiant cannot maintain a consistent story, or is willing to offer a statement solely for the purpose of defeating summary judgment”. Moore, supra, at ¶ 19, citing Pettiford v. Aggarwal, 126 Ohio St.3d 413, 2010-Ohio-3237. The trial court granted both the motion to strike and the motion for summary judgment, and the Fifth District affirmed. The Ohio Supreme Court accepted two questions of law: (1) whether the sham-affidavit rule applies when the sworn testimony contradicts prior unsworn statements; and (2) whether an inconsistency within the affidavit goes to credibility or admissibility, justifying an order striking the affidavit. Previous rulings by the Ohio Supreme Court regarding the sham-affidavit rule have pertained to contradictions between an affidavit and sworn deposition testimony. See, e.g., Byrd v. Smith, 2006- Ohio-3455, 110 Ohio St.3d 24, 850 N.E.2d 47. However, here, the Court was asked to apply the same rule to contradictions between a sworn affidavit and an unsworn expert report. The Court held that, because Moore’s expert incorporated his prior report into his affidavit, he effectively adopted the report as part of his sworn testimony.

News

106 Marshall Dennehey Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and the Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America

Marshall Dennehey is proud to highlight the firm’s 106 attorneys who have been recognized in the 2027 editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and the Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America. Less than 6% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for this recognition. Additionally, four of the firm’s attorneys received the Best Lawyers® 2027 “Lawyer of the Year” awards in their respective practice areas and demographic regions. Since it was first published in 1983, Best Lawyers® has become universally regarded as the definitive guide to legal excellence. Best Lawyers lists are compiled based on an exhaustive peer-review evaluation. For more information, please visit https://www.bestlawyers.com/. OUR 2027 LAWYERS OF THE YEAR Harrisburg, PA Christopher Reeser, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Kacey Wiedt, Workers Compensation Law - Employers Roseland, NJ Justin F. Johnson, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Leonard Leicht, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants   OUR 2026 BEST LAWYERS IN AMERICA Philadelphia, PA Nicholas D. Bowers, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Josh J. T. Byrne, Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants Jefferey J. Chomko, Insurance Law James H. Cole, Insurance Law John J. Delany III, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Laurianne Falcone, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants John P. Gonzales, Employment Law - Management John Hare, Appellate Practice Daniel D. Krebbs, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Michele Punturi, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Bradley D. Remick, Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Andrea Cicero Rock, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Robin M. Romano, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Daniel J. Ryan, Jr., Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Gary M. Samms, Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants Christopher N. Santoro, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation -Defendants Josh D. Scheets, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Robert P. Schenk, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Robert E. Smith, Insurance Law Robin Snyder, Litigation - Health Care Michael L. Turner, Commercial Litigation; Criminal Defense: White-Collar; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants Claire Breaux Ventola, Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Pittsburgh, PA Melissa Devich Cochran, Commercial Litigation; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants  John F. Deasy, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Daniel W. Deitrick, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Douglas C. LaSota, Litigation - Construction; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants Joseph V. Lesinski, Product Liability Litigation – Defendants   Christian D. Marquis, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Patricia A. Monahan, Insurance Law; Litigation - Insurance Patrick T. Reilly, Commercial Litigation; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Brett C. Shear, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Teresa O. Sirianni, Education Law; Employment Law – Management; Litigation - Labor and Employment Stuart Sostmann, Product Liability Litigation – Defendants Danielle M. Vugrinovich, Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants Scranton, PA Sarah E. Argo, Litigation - Insurance Michael J. Connolly, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants; Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants Matthew Keris, Litigation - Health Care; Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants John T. McGrath, Jr., Insurance Law; Medical Malpractice Law – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants William J. McPartland, Insurance Law John R. Nealon, Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Victoria Scanlon, Health Care Law; Litigation - Health Care; Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Michael A. Sebastian, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Thomas A. Specht, Insurance Law; Litigation - Insurance Suzanne Tighe, Litigation Insurance Harrisburg , PA Casey Alan Coyle, Administrative/Regulatory Law; Appellate Practice; Commercial Litigation Brittany E. Bakshi, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Shannon P. Fellin, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Allison Krupp, Insurance Law John R. Ninosky, Litigation – Insurance; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Christopher Reeser, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Kacey Wiedt, Workers' Compensation Law – Employers King of Prussia, PA  Michael L. Detweiler, Construction Law Joseph L. Hoynoski III, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Gregory J. Kelley, Construction Law, Litigation - Construction Anthony Natale III, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Francis X. Wickersham, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers A. Judd Woytek, Workers' Compensation Law – Employers Erie, PA Patrick M. Carey, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Joel M. Snavely, Health Care Law; Insurance Law New Haven, CT Michael Wrona, Commercial Litigation, Litigation - Bankruptcy  Mount Laurel, NJ David D. Blake, Litigation - Insurance Barbara Davis, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Lynne Nahmani, Litigation - Health Care John H. Osorio, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants John L. Slimm, Legal Malpractice Law – Defendants; Professional Malpractice Law – Defendants Roseland, NJ Robert T. Evers, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Justin F. Johnson, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Julia Klubenspies, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Leonard C. Leicht, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Patricia M. McDonagh, Appellate Practice Sunny Sparano, Litigation - Construction Randall S. Watts, Health Care Law New York, NY Tonya M. Lindsey, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Tampa, FL Michael Archibald, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Lindsay G. McCormick, Litigation – Construction Orlando, FL Thomas F. Brown, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Dante C. Rohr, Commercial Litigation Fort Lauderdale, FL Kimberly Kanoff Berman, Appellate Practice Patrick M. Delong, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants Jacksonville, FL  Heather Byrer Carbone, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Linda Wagner Farrell, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Elizabeth B. Ferguson, Litigation - Construction James P. Hanratty, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants Wilmington, DE Sarah B. Cole, Litigation - Insurance Benjamin K. Durstein, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Maria R. Granaudo, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants  Keri L. Morris-Johnston, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Cincinnati, OH Timothy B. Schenkel, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants David E. Williamson, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Cleveland, OH Vincent E. Cononico, Litigation – Insurance, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Jillian L. Dinehart, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants David J. Fagnilli, Insurance Law Jason P. Ferrante, Health Care Law, Litigation - Health Care Andrew H. Isakoff, Transportation Law Leslie M. Jenny, Litigation - Health Care; Medical Malpractice Law – Defendant OUR 2026 BEST LAWYERS: ONES TO WATCH Jacksonville, FL Sean J. Reeves, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Orlando, FL Carolin A. Pacheco, Insurance Law Mount Laurel Stacey Gorin, Insurance Law Melville, NY Kimberly Gitlin, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants Matthew A. Gray, Insurance Law; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Philadelphia, PA Holli K. Archer, Health Care Law; Medical Malpractice Law – Defendants; Professional Malpractice Law Emily Pritchyk, Commercial Litigation; Product Liability Litigation – Defendants Pittsburgh, PA Taylor E. Kosko, Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions – Defendants; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Alana Staniszewski, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Michael D. Winsko, Product Liability Litigation – Defendants; Transportation Law King of Prussia, PA Richard Lechette, Commercial Litigation; Insurance Law, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants