.

Defense Digest

On the Pulse…Other Notable Achievements

Defense Digest, Vol. 27, No. 5, December 2021

December 1, 2021

New Shareholders

We are pleased to announce that 13 associates and five special counsel have been elevated to shareholder, effective January 1, 2022. 

  • Elizabeth A. Dietz, an Associate in our Workers’ Compensation Department in Roseland; 
  • Ashley S. Eldridge, an Associate in our Workers’ Compensation Department in Philadelphia;
  • Dana A. Gittleman, an Associate in our Professional Liability Department in Philadelphia;
  • Lisa M. Grubb, an Associate in our Casualty Department in Wilmington;
  • Andrew H. Isakoff, a Special Counsel in the Casualty Department in Cleveland;
  • Ryan M. Krescanko, an Associate in the Casualty Department in Pittsburgh;
  • Todd J. Leon, a Special Counsel in the Professional Liability Department in Philadelphia.
  • Adam E. Levy, a Special Counsel in the Professional Liability Department in Mt. Laurel.
  • Debra M. Marcus, a Special Counsel in the Healthcare Department in Roseland.
  • Erin N. Margolin, an Associate in the Casualty Department in Pittsburgh.
  • Jennifer M. Meyers, an Associate in the Casualty Department in Westchester.
  • Missy Minehan, a Special Counsel in the Healthcare Department in Harrisburg.
  • Darren M. Newberry, an Associate in the Casualty Department in Pittsburgh.
  • Jennifer M. Roberts, an Associate in the Casualty Department in Melville.
  • Sam V. Ruggeri, an Associate in the Casualty Department in Melville.
  • Steven B. Saal, an Associate in the Casualty Department in Westchester. 
  • Corey K. Setterlund, an Associate in the Professional Liability Department in Jacksonville.
  • Alesia S. Sulock, an Associate in the Professional Liability Department in Philadelphia.

Recognition

Buck Buchanan (Philadelphia, PA) received the 2021 Renaissance Man Award From the Philadelphia Chapter of the National Bar Association Women Lawyers Division. Buck was recognized during the organization’s virtual “Jazz in June” awards ceremony and cocktail reception. The annual award recognizes an African American man who has demonstrated commitment to the empowerment, advancement and full participation of women of color in the legal profession. It additionally honors a legacy of professional excellence and commitment to the African American legal community, including support of the NBA/WLD.
 

Published Articles

Kimberly Berman (Fort Lauderdale, FL) authored the article “Decision Creates Potential for Legal Malpractice Actions Against Retained Defense Attorneys,” in the Daily Business Review. You can read the article here: https://www.law.com/dailybusinessreview/2021/07/30/decision-creates-potential-for-legal-malpractice-actions-against-retained-defense-attorneys/. 

Josh Byrne (Philadelphia, PA) recently authored an article entitled “Preparing for the Worst: Considerations in Purchasing Legal Malpractice Insurance—Part I,” for The Legal Intelligencer. You can read this article here: https://marshalldennehey.com/articles/preparing-worst-considerations-purchasing-legal-malpractice-insurance%E2%80%94part-i. 

Karen Grethlein and David Shannon (Philadelphia, PA) co-authored the article “Cyber Threats: Why the Construction Industry Could be the Next Big Target,” which was published in The Legal Intelligencer, Construction Law Supplement on August 12, 2021. The article can be read here: https://marshalldennehey.com/articles/cyber-threats-why-construction-industry-could-be-next-big-target. 
    
Kiara Hartwell (Mount Laurel, NJ) answers the question “What does the future hold for current COVID-19 workers’ compensation claims?” in an article from the June 2021 issue of CLM Magazine. You can read “Consulting the Comp Crystal Ball” here: https://bit.ly/3qAwhQ5. 

Megan Nelson (Orlando, FL) authored the article, “Am I Getting Fired? How to Handle Meetings With Your Facility’s Attorney,” which was published in the September 2021 issue of Orlando Medical News. You may read the article here: https://www.orlandomedicalnews.com/article/5034/am-i-getting-fired-how-to-handle-meetings-with-your-facilitys-attorney

Tony Natale (Philadelphia, PA) authored the article, “The State of Pay for Play – College Athletes as Employees and the Implications for Workers’ Compensation,” appearing in the September 2021 issue of CLM Magazine. The article discusses how college athletes are inching closer to being recognized as “employees” of their schools, and what the implications are for workers compensation. Click to read the article: https://736506f6.flowpaper.com/CLMSeptember2021/#page=30 

David Shannon (Philadelphia, PA) recently authored the article, “Kaseya Data Breach Is Another Signal to Cyber Underwriters About the Dangers of Ransomware Attacks,” for PLUS Blog. You can read this article here: https://plusblog.org/2021/07/19/kaseya-data-breach-is-another-signal-to-cyber-underwriters-about-the-dangers-of-ransomware-attacks/. 

Frank Wickersham (King of Prussia, PA) authored the article “Blurred Lines: A Breakdown of Conventional Workplace Boundaries During the Pandemic,” published in Pennsylvania Law Weekly. You can read the article here: https://marshalldennehey.com/articles/blurred-lines-breakdown-conventional-workplace-boundaries-during-pandemic. 
 

Speaking Engagements

Robert Aldrich (Scranton, PA), Patrick Reilly (Pittsburgh, PA) and Charlene Seibert (Pittsburgh, PA) presented at the Pennsylvania Defense Institute 2021 Annual Conference. Pat was a panelist presenting on the topic “The New Marketing Tool—Creating a Podcast that People Want to Hear.” Robert was a moderator for the topic “Legal Marketing on LinkedIn—Learn How Law Firms are Leveraging LinkedIn’s Unique Data and Environment to Engage Clients and Prospects to Grow Their Business.” Charlene was a panel member discussing “Legal Malpractice Concerns in the New Remote World—Ethics Complaints, Legal Malpractice Actions, and Protecting Your Practice in the Post-COVID-19 –World.”

Mohamed Bakry (Philadelphia, PA) moderated a panel at the Defense Research Institute’s Diversity for Success seminar. In their session, “A Conversation About Racial Justice in America,” Mohamed and panelists explored the inequities related to racial justice and addressed ways to move the dialogue into action so that the cycle of injustice can be broken.

Buck Buchanan (Philadelphia, PA) was among a panel of leaders for the Philadelphia Bar Association Virtual Spring Quarterly. Featuring Peter Cappelli, from The Wharton School, the panel discussed “Workplace Culture, Equity and Safety as Our Community Emerges From a Global Pandemic.”

Josh Byrne and Alesia Sulock (Philadelphia, PA) presented “Legal Malpractice Avoidance” to a number of local bar associations. They made this presentation to the Philadelphia Bar Association, the Monroe County Bar Association and the Chester County Bar Association. 

Peggy Smith Bush (Orlando, FL), Leonard Leicht (Roseland, NJ) and Harold Moroknek (Westchester, NY) presented “Rules of the Trucking Industry: Staying on Track!” at the virtual Transportation Lawyers Association Annual Conference. The panel discussed the new FMCSA regulations and the impact of the New Drug and Clearing House Rules. They also discussed updates in the Hours of Service Rules, the effect of national declarations entered during the COVID-19 pandemic, new requirements for CDL driving academies, and legal and practical issues in setting up a truck driving training school.

Several of our attorneys returned as faculty this September for the 2021 CLM Claims College. Christopher Block (Roseland, NJ) served as faculty with the School of Casualty, and Michael Packer (Fort Lauderdale, FL) and James Cole (Philadelphia, PA) were both instructors for the School of Property Claims. The Claims College is an educational experience designed to help educate and grow industry claims professionals and the industry. Each school within the college is comprised of three levels and participants who successfully complete all levels in a particular school receive a CLM designation reflecting their education and commitment to the profession.

Alicia Caridi (Tampa, FL) co-presented to the Roller Skating Association’s 2021 Sk8Expo in Clearwater Beach, Florida. Alicia and Jerry Landers, the president of IALDA, presented live and via Zoom on the topic of “Surveillance as Pertains to the Industry.”

Samuel Cohen, Gerry Kowalski, and Ryan Friel (Philadelphia, PA) presented “Claims Involving Life Insurance Impacting Life Agents and Broker Dealers” at the Independent Broker Dealer Consortium. Held in Bluffton, South Carolina, this annual conference is primarily attended by broker dealers, insurance brokers and E&O carriers. 

Jim Cole (Philadelphia, PA) co-presented “US/Canadian Litigation in a Post-COVID-19 World” at the Insurance Law Global and Lloyd’s Market Association Young Professionals Virtual Boot Camp webinar series. This free webinar explored how the pandemic has impacted insurance litigation across the U.S. and Canada. 

Joan Ford (King of Prussia, PA) was a panelist at The American Board of Trial Advocates program and CLE, “How to Succeed: Career Lessons from Veteran Female Trial Lawyers as We Face the Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Attendees learned from veteran female trial lawyers as they shared the insights and experiences that led to their success and discussed best practices for career development as we face the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Janice Merrill, Chanel Mosley and Megan Nelson (Orlando, FL) presented at the Florida Society for Healthcare Risk Management & Patient Safety Annual Meeting & Education Conference. In “Adversity in the World of Adverse Incident Reporting: A Panel Discussion on Reporting Requirements and Addressing Related Discovery,” they discussed Amendment 7 and the requirements for reporting and investigating potential adverse events, including the impact of adverse events related to COVID-19. The program also highlighted best practices for complying with the reporting requirements while preserving the attorney-client communication, work product and peer review privileges.

Robin Romano (Philadelphia, PA) participated in a panel discussion, “Emotional Intelligence: The Art of Friendly Persuasion,” held by the Philadelphia Bar Association.

Anthony Williott (Pittsburgh, PA) was a panelist for a webinar, “Pain and Suffering in Personal Injury: Doctor, Plaintiff, and Defense Perspectives.” The program included doctor and attorney insights to provide the audience with concrete instruction for handling non-economic damages. Topics included how doctors assess the severity and cause of pain, understanding how an adjuster will value a claim, presentation strategies that will help deliver maximum offers and jury verdicts and defense tactics for managing excess exposure and avoiding runaway verdicts.

 

Defense Digest, Vol. 27, No. 5, December 2021 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1. © 2021 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. All Rights Reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm. For reprints, contact tamontemuro@mdwcg.com.

Firm Highlights

Thought Leadership

Commonwealth Court Deemed Worker an Employee Despite Independent Contractor Agreement; Insurer Estopped from Denying Coverage

In this case, the claimant filed a Claim Petition for injuries sustained on October 28, 2019, naming J&S as his Employer, and alleging that the injuries occurred when he fell from a ladder while installing a satellite dish for Dish Network. Dish Network contracted with J&S to install satellite dishes. Subsequently J&S filed a Petition to Join Brickstreet Insurance Company and the claimant filed a Claim Petition against the Uninsured Employer Guaranty Fund. The Fund then joined Dish Network as another employer.  Before the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ), the claimant testified that he was hired in 2015 by J&S and at the time signed an Independent Contractor Agreement (IC Agreement). J&S defended the case on the basis that the claimant was not an employee, but was an independent contractor, even after the IC Agreement expired. Additional evidence showed that, at the time of the October 28, 2019, work injury, J&S’ workers’ compensation insurance with Brickstreet had lapsed, even though a Brickstreet agent had been working to renew J&S’ policy and had a Certificate for coverage from September 25, 2019 to September 25, 2020 issued, with Dish Network listed as the Certificate Holder. A renewal policy was not in effect at the time the Certificate was issued and the agent learned on October 25, 2019 that Brickstreet was not going to renew their policy with J&S, due to an unpaid premium.    Ultimately, the WCJ found that the claimant was an employee of J&S at the time of the work injury and that J&S did not have a workers’ compensation policy in place at the time, due to their failure to pay the renewal premium to Brickstreet. The WCJ also found Dish Network was a Statutory Employer under Section 302(a) of the Act. The Claim Petition and the Guaranty Fund Claim Petition were both granted, as was the Guaranty Fund’s Petition to Join Dish Network. The WCJ also denied J&S’ Petition to Join Brickstreet, finding that neither J&S or Dish Network showed that Brickstreet was estopped from denying coverage. J&S and Dish Network appealed to the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) and the Board affirmed. J&S and Dish Network appealed to the Commonwealth Court. The Commonwealth Court rejected J&S' argument that the claimant was an independent contractor. In doing so, the court noted that the claimant credibly testified that he worked for J&S full time, could not work for another company, and that J&S, scheduled his jobs, tracked him, and scheduled additional installations, if he finished early. Additionally, the court noted the claimant lacked discretion in the manner he performed his job, because all questions had to be referred to J&S.  As for Dish Network’s appeal, the court held that the WCJ erred in holding that Brickstreet was not estopped from denying coverage as to Dish Network. According to the court, the insurance agent was an authorized representative of Brickstreet and, at the direction of J&S, issued the Certificate of Insurance that he knew was not accurate at the time, and was aware would be presented as proof of coverage for J&S. Dish Network relied upon that information and continued to use J&S, ultimately leading to Dish Network being named as the Statutory Employer liable for payment of benefits because of J&S’ uninsured status. The court held that the Board erred in affirming the WCJ ’s conclusion that Dish Network did not establish that Brickstreet was equitably estopped from denying coverage, reversed the decision below, and remanded the case to the WCJ. 

Ellen C. Bodenmiller Joins Marshall Dennehey’s Tampa Office as Special Counsel in the Casualty Department

News

Ellen C. Bodenmiller Joins Marshall Dennehey’s Tampa Office as Special Counsel in the Casualty Department

Result

Statutory Employer Immunity Upheld

In this construction accident case that resulted in a $5 million verdict, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania upheld the Statutory Employer Doctrine, which immunizes general contractors and other contractors on construction sites when certain elements are satisfied.

Thought Leadership

Florida Supreme Court Adopts Traditionally More Expansive Concept of Occupational Causation

The Florida Supreme Court issued a significant decision rebuking the First District Court of Appeal (1st DCA) in the high-profile case of Bouayad v. Normandy Insurance Co., a case addressing the compensability of workplace injuries resulting from assaults by third-party tortfeasors. The Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) found the claimant was entitled to workers' compensation benefits, relying in part on the Florida Supreme Court's earlier decision in Strother v. Morrison Cafeteria from 1980. In Strother, the Court upheld an award of benefits to a cashier who was assaulted and robbed by individuals who followed her home from work under the mistaken belief that she was carrying restaurant cash deposits. In Bouayad, the 1st DCA concluded that the claimant's injuries were not compensable because they did not arise out of his employment. The Florida Supreme Court disagreed, holding that the 1st DCA applied too narrow an interpretation of the "arising out of employment" requirement. In doing so, the Court reaffirmed a broader and more traditional view of occupational causation than that recently adopted by the 1st DCA. The claimant in Bouayad was the general manager of a car rental business operating from a hotel near an airport. Around midnight, while walking along a covered outdoor walkway from the hotel's atrium, where the rental kiosk was located, to an office near the pool, he was shot multiple times by an unidentified assailant. As part of his regular duties, the claimant carried rental agreements and cash receipts from the kiosk to the office at the end of each shift. After the shooting, the claimant managed to return to the hotel atrium, where he stated that he believed "Robert" had shot him, referring to an individual who had threatened the claimant's son the previous day. The assailant, however, was never identified. Consequently, the Supreme Court analyzed the case as involving an unknown third party while the claimant was acting within the course and scope of his employment. The central issue therefore was whether the injury "arose out of" the claimant’s employment. At the final hearing, the claimant presented evidence regarding the risks and hazards associated with his employment, including the nature of his duties, his late-night work schedule, and the location of the business in a high-turnover hotel near a major airport. His expert opined that these factors exposed him to an increased risk of becoming the victim of a crime while at work. In contrast, the employer/carrier's expert characterized the shooting as a targeted attack rather than a robbery and asserted that the risk of violent crime was actually higher near the claimant's residence than at the hotel. Based on that analysis, the expert concluded that the claimant was not exposed to an increased workplace risk. The 1st DCA focused narrowly on the specific activity the claimant was performing at the moment of injury. According to the court, the claimant's “work performed” at the time of the shooting was simply "walking" between two employer-operated locations, and that act of walking did not itself cause the injury. The Florida Supreme Court found this analysis far too myopic and inconsistent with decades of workers' compensation precedent. Reaffirming longstanding principles of workplace causation, the Court explained that the proper inquiry is not whether the precise physical task being performed at the moment of injury directly caused the harm. Rather, the relevant question is whether the employment, viewed as a whole, exposed the worker to risks and hazards that contributed to the injury. The decision is significant because it reinforces a broader conception of work-relatedness in the “arising out of” compensability analysis. Instead of limiting the causation analysis to the employee's discrete physical activity at the time of injury, courts must consider the totality of the employment circumstances, including the employee's duties, work environment, hours, and occupational risks. Under that framework, an injury may arise out of employment when the employment places the employee in a position of increased hazard, even if the specific task being performed at the moment of injury is not itself the direct cause of the harm.

Result

$1.09 Billion Products Liability Verdict Overturned

In this products liability crashworthiness case, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania reversed a Philadelphia jury verdict of $1.09 billion, the largest verdict ever overturned by a PA appellate court.  The court ordered a new trial based on deficient jury instructions, clarified important aspects of crashworthiness law, and confirmed that so-called standard jury instructions may be incompatible with Pennsylvania law. 

Result

$19 Million Medical Malpractice Verdict Overturned

In this medical malpractice case, the trial court vacated $10 million of a $19 million verdict in post-trial motions and the Superior Court of Pennsylvania vacated the remaining $9 million on appeal.

Thought Leadership

Appellate Division Affirmed Trial Judge’s Orders Granting Summary Judgement for Defendants on COVID-19 Case

In Dunne v. Advanced Subacute Rehab Servs. at Sewell, LLC, et al., the plaintiffs appealed from two Law Division orders. By way of background, Louis Doto, Sr. (Doto) worked for BP & SC Services, Inc. (BP). BP leased Doto to Advanced Subacute Rehabilitation Center at Sewell, LLC (Advanced Subacute) and it had control of his work, paid wages, and had the power to hire or fire him. A BP employee was assigned to the facility to train and supervise him and BP was responsible for securing workers’ compensation coverage. Doto worked as an aide in the laundry department. Linen from COVID-19 residents were delivered in clearly marked bags and he had no direct contact with residents. A co-worker, Sheila Smith, was also an aide and she never contracted COVID-19 at the facility. Advanced Subacute did not require Doto to wear an N-95 mask, but instead a surgical mask, though N-95 masks were available to all employees. He was also required to attend period mandatory meetings with other high-risk employees, the last of which he attended was in November 2020. All employees were required to test for COVID-19 and there were no reported cases from June to October 2020. On December 23, 2020, Doto tested positive for COVID-19 and passed away on January 18, 2021. The last member of housekeeping that Doto may have encountered tested positive 22 days earlier. After his death, OSHA found two “serious” violations concerning the N-95 masks worn by housekeepers. In response, Advanced Subacute fit tested all non-clinical staff. Doto’s estate filed a workers’ compensation claim and named both BP and Advanced Subacute as his employer. The estate received an award. In July 2022, the plaintiffs filed a complaint in the Law Division, alleging wrongful death and survivor causes of action. In October 2024, the defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing: 1) immunity pursuant to the Emergency Health Powers Act: 2) the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act; 3) Doto’s inability to establish infection at the facility; 4) net expert opinions by the plaintiffs’ expert; and 5) inadmissibility of the OSHA report. The plaintiffs opposed and filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, arguing: 1) no immunity as Advanced Subacute engaged in gross negligent or willful misconduct; 2) no preclusion by the Workers’ Compensation Act as Doto was not Advanced Subacute’s employee; and 3) no net expert opinions. In February 2025, the judge issued a written decision granting the defendants’ motion. Specifically, he found Advanced Subacute’s COVID-19 immunity precluded the plaintiffs’ claim as no reasonable jury could find any gross negligence or utter disregard for Doto’s safety. He also addressed the other defenses for completeness. The plaintiffs moved for reconsideration and the judge issued another written decision denying the plaintiffs’ motion in April 2025. The plaintiffs then appealed both decision. The Appellate Division affirmed the orders for reasons stated by the judge in his written decisions. The Appellate Division only added: 1) Advanced Subacute acted consistently with the legislative grant of immunity; 2) there was no doubt Doto was an employee of both BP and Advanced Subacute and the latter may have inadvertently failed to follow some precautions; and 3) confirmed the plaintiffs’ experts did not identify a basis for their opinions. Ultimately, the Appellate Division found no reason to disturb the judge’s well-reasoned decisions and affirmed the judge’s orders.

News

106 Marshall Dennehey Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and the Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America

Marshall Dennehey is proud to highlight the firm’s 106 attorneys who have been recognized in the 2027 editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and the Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America. Less than 6% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for this recognition. Additionally, four of the firm’s attorneys received the Best Lawyers® 2027 “Lawyer of the Year” awards in their respective practice areas and demographic regions. Since it was first published in 1983, Best Lawyers® has become universally regarded as the definitive guide to legal excellence. Best Lawyers lists are compiled based on an exhaustive peer-review evaluation. For more information, please visit https://www.bestlawyers.com/. OUR 2027 LAWYERS OF THE YEAR Harrisburg, PA Christopher Reeser, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Kacey Wiedt, Workers Compensation Law - Employers Roseland, NJ Justin F. Johnson, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Leonard Leicht, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants   OUR 2026 BEST LAWYERS IN AMERICA Philadelphia, PA Nicholas D. Bowers, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Josh J. T. Byrne, Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants Jefferey J. Chomko, Insurance Law James H. Cole, Insurance Law John J. Delany III, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Laurianne Falcone, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants John P. Gonzales, Employment Law - Management John Hare, Appellate Practice Daniel D. Krebbs, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Michele Punturi, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Bradley D. Remick, Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Andrea Cicero Rock, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Robin M. Romano, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Daniel J. Ryan, Jr., Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Gary M. Samms, Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants Christopher N. Santoro, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation -Defendants Josh D. Scheets, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Robert P. Schenk, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Robert E. Smith, Insurance Law Robin Snyder, Litigation - Health Care Michael L. Turner, Commercial Litigation; Criminal Defense: White-Collar; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants Claire Breaux Ventola, Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Pittsburgh, PA Melissa Devich Cochran, Commercial Litigation; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants  John F. Deasy, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Daniel W. Deitrick, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Douglas C. LaSota, Litigation - Construction; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants Joseph V. Lesinski, Product Liability Litigation – Defendants   Christian D. Marquis, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Patricia A. Monahan, Insurance Law; Litigation - Insurance Patrick T. Reilly, Commercial Litigation; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Brett C. Shear, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Teresa O. Sirianni, Education Law; Employment Law – Management; Litigation - Labor and Employment Stuart Sostmann, Product Liability Litigation – Defendants Danielle M. Vugrinovich, Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants Scranton, PA Sarah E. Argo, Litigation - Insurance Michael J. Connolly, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants; Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants Matthew Keris, Litigation - Health Care; Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants John T. McGrath, Jr., Insurance Law; Medical Malpractice Law – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants William J. McPartland, Insurance Law John R. Nealon, Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Victoria Scanlon, Health Care Law; Litigation - Health Care; Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Michael A. Sebastian, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Thomas A. Specht, Insurance Law; Litigation - Insurance Suzanne Tighe, Litigation Insurance Harrisburg , PA Casey Alan Coyle, Administrative/Regulatory Law; Appellate Practice; Commercial Litigation Brittany E. Bakshi, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Shannon P. Fellin, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Allison Krupp, Insurance Law John R. Ninosky, Litigation – Insurance; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Christopher Reeser, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Kacey Wiedt, Workers' Compensation Law – Employers King of Prussia, PA  Michael L. Detweiler, Construction Law Joseph L. Hoynoski III, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Gregory J. Kelley, Construction Law, Litigation - Construction Anthony Natale III, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Francis X. Wickersham, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers A. Judd Woytek, Workers' Compensation Law – Employers Erie, PA Patrick M. Carey, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Joel M. Snavely, Health Care Law; Insurance Law New Haven, CT Michael Wrona, Commercial Litigation, Litigation - Bankruptcy  Mount Laurel, NJ David D. Blake, Litigation - Insurance Barbara Davis, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Lynne Nahmani, Litigation - Health Care John H. Osorio, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants John L. Slimm, Legal Malpractice Law – Defendants; Professional Malpractice Law – Defendants Roseland, NJ Robert T. Evers, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Justin F. Johnson, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Julia Klubenspies, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Leonard C. Leicht, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Patricia M. McDonagh, Appellate Practice Sunny Sparano, Litigation - Construction Randall S. Watts, Health Care Law New York, NY Tonya M. Lindsey, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Tampa, FL Michael Archibald, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Lindsay G. McCormick, Litigation – Construction Orlando, FL Thomas F. Brown, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Dante C. Rohr, Commercial Litigation Fort Lauderdale, FL Kimberly Kanoff Berman, Appellate Practice Patrick M. Delong, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants Jacksonville, FL  Heather Byrer Carbone, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Linda Wagner Farrell, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Elizabeth B. Ferguson, Litigation - Construction James P. Hanratty, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants Wilmington, DE Sarah B. Cole, Litigation - Insurance Benjamin K. Durstein, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Maria R. Granaudo, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants  Keri L. Morris-Johnston, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Cincinnati, OH Timothy B. Schenkel, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants David E. Williamson, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Cleveland, OH Vincent E. Cononico, Litigation – Insurance, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Jillian L. Dinehart, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants David J. Fagnilli, Insurance Law Jason P. Ferrante, Health Care Law, Litigation - Health Care Andrew H. Isakoff, Transportation Law Leslie M. Jenny, Litigation - Health Care; Medical Malpractice Law – Defendant OUR 2026 BEST LAWYERS: ONES TO WATCH Jacksonville, FL Sean J. Reeves, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Orlando, FL Carolin A. Pacheco, Insurance Law Mount Laurel Stacey Gorin, Insurance Law Melville, NY Kimberly Gitlin, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants Matthew A. Gray, Insurance Law; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Philadelphia, PA Holli K. Archer, Health Care Law; Medical Malpractice Law – Defendants; Professional Malpractice Law Emily Pritchyk, Commercial Litigation; Product Liability Litigation – Defendants Pittsburgh, PA Taylor E. Kosko, Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions – Defendants; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Alana Staniszewski, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Michael D. Winsko, Product Liability Litigation – Defendants; Transportation Law King of Prussia, PA Richard Lechette, Commercial Litigation; Insurance Law, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants

Jason Banonis Holds PDI Attorney of the Year Award with the PDI President

News

Jason Banonis Named Attorney of the Year by the Pennsylvania Defense Institute

Result

Federal Statute Declared Constitutional

In this products liability case, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania reversed the Superior Court and upheld the constitutionality of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which resulted in judgment as a matter of law for the defendant manufacturer.