.

Defense Digest

On the Pulse…Other Notable Achievements

Defense Digest, Vol. 28, No. 3, October 2022

October 1, 2022

APPOINTMENTS

Melanie Foreman (Philadelphia, PA) and her co-chair of the Leadership Council of Community Legal Services will spearhead CLS’s annual Bar Campaign. The Bar Campaign raises critical funds for CLS from Philadelphia law firms and businesses. Funds raised support the mission of CLS.

Harold Moroknek (Westchester, NY) has been selected to the Executive Committee of the Bus Industry Safety Council (BISC), a division of the American Bus Association. BISC is comprised of security, mechanical, safety, operational and maintenance leaders from across the North American motor coach industry. As an attorney member of the council, Harold advises on legal issues impacting the industry, including litigation strategies for defending, mitigating and avoiding transportation claims.

Charlene Seibert (Pittsburgh, PA) has been appointed to a three-year term as a Hearing Committee Member of District IV or the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Hearing Committee Members perform essential roles in Pennsylvania’s disciplinary system, chief among them to review Disciplinary Counsel’s recommended dispositions and to conduct hearings into formal charges of attorney misconduct and petitions for reinstatement. These efforts, which include reviewing pleadings and briefs, weighing evidence, and writing reports, are critical to guiding the Board and the Supreme Court in their determinations.

Stuart Sostmann (Pittsburgh, PA) was elected president of the Pennsylvania Defense Institute (PDI) at the organization’s recent annual conference.

RECOGNITION

Michael Bradford (Tampa, FL) and James Hanratty (Jacksonville, FL) have been selected to the 2022 Florida Trend Legal Elite. Both are recognized for excellence in the Civil Trial category. Honorees represent less than 2% of active Florida Bar members and include attorneys in private practice as well as top government and non-profit attorneys.

A.C. Nash (Fort Lauderdale, FL) received a “Best Mentors Award” from the Daily Business Review.

G. Mark Thompson (Philadelphia, PA) was named to 2022 City & State Pennsylvania’s Law Power 100. The list annually recognizes lawyers who exhibit excellence in the profession of law and are deemed to be some of the state’s most influential leaders.

SEMINARS

Mohamed Bakry (Philadelphia, PA) presented at the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel (FDCC) Winter Meeting. His topic was “Two Years Into a Pandemic – What Your Jurors May Be Thinking.” Mohamed was also a panelist at the FDCC Annual Meeting, where he discussed the topic “Anatomy of a Trial: Opening Statement and Closing Argument.” The panel reviewed how to use an opening statement and closing argument to establish why fairness and justice require a favorable verdict for your client. Finally, Mohamed spoke on behalf of the International Association of Defense Counsel (IADC) on “Becoming an Active Ally with a Focus on Allyship With Our Muslim Colleagues: How to Get Involved, Stay Involved, and Educate Others About Racial and Social Injustice.”

Kimberly Kanoff Berman (Fort Lauderdale, FL) participated in an episode of Summarily: A Podcast for Busy Lawyers. In “UNprecedented,” Kim and Adam Richardson of Burlington Rockenbach discussed how Florida state courts and lawyers are treating precedent.

Josh Byrne (Philadelphia, PA) presented at the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s annual Spring 2022 Avoiding Legal Malpractice Program. “Avoiding Legal Malpractice” was presented by the PBA Professional Liability Committee and featured information on a variety of issues that have been identified as common areas where attorneys can be exposed to liability or malpractice claims and focuses on steps we can all take to avoid, or at least mitigate, potential claims. Josh also co-presented the webinar “Dealing with Difficult Opposing Counsel 2022” for the Pennsylvania Bar Institute. Co-presented with members of the Bar and the judiciary, this session offered tools, techniques and insight into practical and effective methods of dealing with difficult opposing counsel, while complying with the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Jim Cole (Philadelphia, PA) recently gave two presentations on insurance fraud. He co-presented “Appraisal: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly” at the 2022 Pennsylvania Insurance Fraud Conference in Hershey, PA. Jim also presented, “Fraud Claims: The Real Housewives Edition,” at the 2022 PLRB Claims Conference & Insurance Services Expo in San Antonio, TX.

Benjamin Durstein (Wilmington, DE) presented “The Do’s and Don’ts of Workers’ Compensation Practice” on behalf of the Delaware State Bar Association.

Linda Farrell (Jacksonville, FL) presented “You Had Me at…Avoiding Fee Exposure” at the Association of Workers’ Compensation Claims Professional’s 30th Annual Claims Management and Leadership Conference.

Elizabeth Ferguson (Jacksonville, FL) chaired The Florida Bar’s Construction Law Review Course.

John Hare (Philadelphia, PA) presented Civil Litigation Update 2022 on behalf of the Pennsylvania Bar Institute. John also attended the Commemoration of the 300th Anniversary of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia. John was part of a distinguished faculty of scholars, attorneys and jurists at this symposium, which included the Honorable Anthony M. Kennedy, Retired Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court.

Matthew Keris (Scranton, PA) has been traveling the county giving presentations on RaDonda Vaught criminal verdict and artificial intelligence in health care. Here is a sample of his recent presentations:

American Legal Connections - “Liability Issues With Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Litigation”

American Society for Healthcare Risk Management - “Best Practices for Balancing Transparency While Avoiding Liability Following the RaDonda Vaught Criminal Verdict”

CHART Institute’s virtual conference - “A New Frontier: Maintaining Transparency and Defenses Following the RaDonda Vaught Criminal Verdict”

Duke University’s School of Nursing - “RaDonda Vaught—What Happened and What Can We Learn From Her Trial”

Medical Professional Liability Association - “Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Revolutionary or Risky?”

New England Regional Healthcare Risk Management Conference (NERHRMC) - “The New Reality--Managing the EMR and Audit Trail”

Ohio Hospital Association Annual Meeting - “Risks and Legal Aspects of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care”

Thomson Reuters’ Virtual Conference - “Litigation Risks Associated with AI in Healthcare”

Washington Healthcare Risk Management Society Annual Meeting in Seattle, WA - “New Risks With the Application of Artificial Intelligence to Medicine”

West Virginia ASHRM Chapter - “A Hard Task: Balancing Transparency While Avoiding Liability Following the RaDonda Vaught Criminal Verdict”

Mark Kozlowski (Scranton, PA) presented “Pay & Benefits – Overtime, Minimum Wage, Compensable Time, Legally Required Benefits” before the members of the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM).

Paul Krepps (Pittsburgh, PA) was a featured speaker at the Allegheny County Bar Association CLE program, “Law Against Violence.” Paul and a panel of lawmakers, practitioners, academics, and the judiciary covered the current state of the domestic violence prevention system and the pros and cons of adopting Alina’s Law, which would increase electronic monitoring of both parties to domestic violence in an effort to provide protection to the victim. Paul presented, “Impact of Protection from Abuse Orders: A Case Study,” that described the homicide of a victim of domestic violence, observations on the legal system and improvements that were enacted post-investigation. Paul also was a co-presenter at the annual Pennsylvania Defense Institute Conference on the topic of Qualified Immunity.

Mary Kate McGrath and Adam Fulginiti (Philadelphia, PA) presented “Taking the Telemedicine Time-Out,” an educational webinar for the Philadelphia Area Society of Healthcare Risk Management (PASHRM). They discussed the importance of taking “time-outs” to ensure that telemedicine systems comport with regulatory requirements, enhance the quality of patient care, and reduce the potential for malpractice.

Harold Moroknek (Westchester, NY) made a presentation at the Omaha Nebraska CLM Chapter event titled “Where Are You Leaking.” This presentation was a look at controlling costs and reducing claims through minimizing errors and omissions. Additionally, Harold presented for a client on “Assault Analysis” discussing the rise of claim numbers and values nationally in physical and sexual assault cases. Harold also spent time in Atlanta at the Auto Haulers Association of America (AHAA) Spring 2022 meeting. He partnered with Carrie Wall of the Bill Fralic Insurance Group to present “Where Are You Leaking? Pain Points and Missteps: Things That Cost a Motor Carrier Unnecessary Defense and Indemnity Dollars.”

Michael Packer (Fort Lauderdale, FL) presented at the Florida Defense Lawyers Association’s Florida Liability Claims Conference. His seminar, “Investigating a Claim Under a Reservation of Rights,” explored strategies for managing claims that may not be covered and continuing the investigation once a Reservation of Rights has been issued.

Michele Punturi (Philadelphia, PA) presented “The Dawning of the Age of Remote Work” at CLM’s Workers’ Comp and Retail, Restaurant & Hospitality Conference.

Jeff Rapattoni (Mount Laurel, NJ) presented twice at the New England Chapter of IASIU’s annual conference, where he presented “Fraud in Telemedicine” and “Litigation Trends in SIU.” Jeff also gave a presentation to the Illinois Chapter of IASIU entitled “PI’s in the Field – Pre, During & Post COVID & New Manned/Unmanned Surveillance.” Jeff also attended the annual CLM Conference and presented “The CAT’s Out of the Bag: Insurance Fraud in Catastrophic Losses.” Jeff participated remotely in the ILG Annual Conference held in London, when he presented “Financial Institutions (White Collar Crime/Fraud).” Finally, Jeff was recently in Malmo, Sweden, at the International Association of Special Investigation Units European Seminar & Expo where he co-presented “Major Case Preparation.”

Martin Schwartzberg (Long Island, NY) recently made a presentation titled “Ethics for Engineers” to the Long Island Chapter of American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC).

Dave Shannon (Philadelphia, PA) co-presented at the ILG annual conference and the USLI Cyber Security Conference. On behalf of ILG, Dave participated as a speaker in the program “Cyber (Ransomware).” Dave also gave a seminar entitled “How to Protect Yourself from Hackers, Rogue Employees and Cyber Crime” for USLI at their annual Cyber Security Conference.

Jack Slimm and Jeremy Zacharias (Mount Laurel, NJ) presented a webinar entitled “Virtual Trials in New Jersey: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.” This was presented to an audience comprised of claims professionals, attorneys and various insurance companies. Jack and Jeremy explained their experience with trying cases in a virtual and hybrid setting, and gave practical pointers and strategies in trying a case, picking a jury, and presenting evidence in a virtual format. Jack and Jeremy introduced the firm’s capabilities from a technological standpoint and described the staffing that is needed for trying a virtual or a hybrid case.

Robert Stanko (Philadelphia, PA) recently presented a webinar for the members of the Dallas Claims Association (DCA) on the topic “Successful Strategies for Effective Mediation.”

OTHER NEWS

Gaylene Coover, office manager of our Jacksonville office, was recently sworn in as a member of the Board of Directors of the Association of Legal Administrators Jacksonville Chapter.

Congratulations to our very own Stephanie Ransom, assistant office manager of our New York City and Roseland, NJ offices, upon her selection to the Association of Legal Administrators (ALA) Certification Committee. This is a national position and follows Stephanie’s tenure as a Vice President on the ALA’s NYC Chapter Board of Directors.

Jeff Rapattoni (Mount Laurel, NJ) was recently interviewed at a recent International Association of Special Investigation Units (IASIU) conference. In this video, he explains how carriers can avoid bad faith by making sure staff gets real training by getting interactive and personal attention. This will ensure people make right and informed decisions. If carriers are prepared and encourage staff to know they have their backs and will indemnify them, people will embrace the challenge of starting a career in insurance. They will not be afraid to do the right things when fighting fraud.

An interview with Jeremy Zacharias (Mount Laurel, NJ) was published by PLUS (Professional Liability Underwriting Society). Jeremy discusses his involvement in PLUS and his career in the liability insurance industry. Interview Link: RPLU Designee Testimonials (plusweb.org).

Published Articles

Josh Byrne’s (Philadelphia, PA) article “Sometimes You Have to Fire Your Client to Avoid Issues” was published in the March 18, 2022, edition of The Legal Intelligencer. You can read the article here: https://marshalldennehey.com/articles/sometimes-you-have-fire-your-client-avoid-issues. Josh also authored the article “Legal Malpractice: Taking a Mistake and Making It a Fiasco,” appearing in the May 18, 2022 edition of The Legal Intelligencer. Click here to read the article: https://www.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/2022/05/17/legal-malpractice-taking-a-mistake-and-making-it-a-fiasco/. Finally, Josh’s article “Mental Health, Malpractice Avoidance and Ethical Conduct” was published in the July edition of The Legal Intelligencer. You can read the article here: https://marshalldennehey.com/articles/mental-health-malpractice-avoidance-and-ethical-conduct

Samuel Cohen and Ryan Friels’ (Philadelphia, PA) article “FINRA, the SEC and Congress Aim to Safeguard Senior Investors” was published in the May 12, 2022 issue of The Legal Intelligencer. Click here to read the article: https://marshalldennehey.com/articles/finra-sec-and-congress-aim-safeguard-senior-investors.

Dana Gittleman’s (Philadelphia, PA) recent article “The Importance of Memorializing Insurance Discussions” was posted on PLUS blog. You can read her article here: https://marshalldennehey.com/articles/importance-memorializing-insurance-discussions

Brad Haas’s (Pittsburgh, PA) article “Superior Court Reviews Discoverability of Mental Health Records” was published in the April 7, 2022, issue of Lawyers Journal. You can read the article here: https://marshalldennehey.com/articles/superior-court-reviews-discoverability-mental-health-records

Matthew Keris’s (Scranton, PA) article, “The Evolution of the EMR: The Integration of AI in Medicine,” was published in the March 28, 2022, edition of The Legal Intelligencer. You can read the article here: https://marshalldennehey.com/articles/evolution-emr-integration-ai-medicine

Jeff Rapattoni and Michael Sweeneys’ (Mount Laurel, NJ) article “Beyond Bad Faith: Expanding Bad Faith Damages Fraud-Fighting,” was recently published in the Journal of Insurance Fraud in America for The Coalition Against Insurance Fraud. The article, published March 3, 2022, can be seen at https://insurancefraud.org/publications/jifa-beyond-bad-faith/

Steven Saal’s (Westchester, NY) article “New York State Finalizes Changes to Insurance Disclosure Law” appeared in the May 20, 2022, edition of New York Law Journal. Click here to read this article: https://assets.marshalldennehey.com/content/uploads/2026/04/O-630-by-S.-Saal-05.20.2022-NY-Law-Journal.pdf

Robert Stanko (Philadelphia, PA) authored the article “Commentary: Consequences of SCOTUS Leak Could Be Significant,” appearing in the May 6, 2022 edition of The Legal Intelligencer. You may read the article here: https://www.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/2022/05/06/commentary-consequences-of-scotus-leak-could-be-significant/.

Alesia Sulock (Philadelphia, PA) authored the article “The Attorney-Client Relationship: Keeping the Lines of Communication Open,” appearing on the PLUS Blog. Click here to read: https://plusblog.org/2022/05/09/the-attorney-client-relationship-keeping-the-lines-of-communication-open/.

 

Defense Digest, Vol. 28, No. 3, October 2022 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1. © 2022 Marshall Dennehey. All Rights Reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm. For reprints, contact tamontemuro@mdwcg.com.

Firm Highlights

News

106 Marshall Dennehey Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and the Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America

Marshall Dennehey is proud to highlight the firm’s 106 attorneys who have been recognized in the 2027 editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and the Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America. Less than 6% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for this recognition. Additionally, four of the firm’s attorneys received the Best Lawyers® 2027 “Lawyer of the Year” awards in their respective practice areas and demographic regions. Since it was first published in 1983, Best Lawyers® has become universally regarded as the definitive guide to legal excellence. Best Lawyers lists are compiled based on an exhaustive peer-review evaluation. For more information, please visit https://www.bestlawyers.com/. OUR 2027 LAWYERS OF THE YEAR Harrisburg, PA Christopher Reeser, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Kacey Wiedt, Workers Compensation Law - Employers Roseland, NJ Justin F. Johnson, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Leonard Leicht, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants   OUR 2026 BEST LAWYERS IN AMERICA Philadelphia, PA Nicholas D. Bowers, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Josh J. T. Byrne, Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants Jefferey J. Chomko, Insurance Law James H. Cole, Insurance Law John J. Delany III, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Laurianne Falcone, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants John P. Gonzales, Employment Law - Management John Hare, Appellate Practice Daniel D. Krebbs, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Michele Punturi, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Bradley D. Remick, Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Andrea Cicero Rock, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Robin M. Romano, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Daniel J. Ryan, Jr., Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Gary M. Samms, Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants Christopher N. Santoro, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation -Defendants Josh D. Scheets, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Robert P. Schenk, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Robert E. Smith, Insurance Law Robin Snyder, Litigation - Health Care Michael L. Turner, Commercial Litigation; Criminal Defense: White-Collar; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants Claire Breaux Ventola, Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Pittsburgh, PA Melissa Devich Cochran, Commercial Litigation; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants  John F. Deasy, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Daniel W. Deitrick, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Douglas C. LaSota, Litigation - Construction; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants Joseph V. Lesinski, Product Liability Litigation – Defendants   Christian D. Marquis, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Patricia A. Monahan, Insurance Law; Litigation - Insurance Patrick T. Reilly, Commercial Litigation; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Brett C. Shear, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Teresa O. Sirianni, Education Law; Employment Law – Management; Litigation - Labor and Employment Stuart Sostmann, Product Liability Litigation – Defendants Danielle M. Vugrinovich, Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants Scranton, PA Sarah E. Argo, Litigation - Insurance Michael J. Connolly, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants; Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants Matthew Keris, Litigation - Health Care; Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants John T. McGrath, Jr., Insurance Law; Medical Malpractice Law – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants William J. McPartland, Insurance Law John R. Nealon, Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Victoria Scanlon, Health Care Law; Litigation - Health Care; Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Michael A. Sebastian, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Thomas A. Specht, Insurance Law; Litigation - Insurance Suzanne Tighe, Litigation Insurance Harrisburg , PA Casey Alan Coyle, Administrative/Regulatory Law; Appellate Practice; Commercial Litigation Brittany E. Bakshi, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Shannon P. Fellin, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Allison Krupp, Insurance Law John R. Ninosky, Litigation – Insurance; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Christopher Reeser, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Kacey Wiedt, Workers' Compensation Law – Employers King of Prussia, PA  Michael L. Detweiler, Construction Law Joseph L. Hoynoski III, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Gregory J. Kelley, Construction Law, Litigation - Construction Anthony Natale III, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Francis X. Wickersham, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers A. Judd Woytek, Workers' Compensation Law – Employers Erie, PA Patrick M. Carey, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Joel M. Snavely, Health Care Law; Insurance Law New Haven, CT Michael Wrona, Commercial Litigation, Litigation - Bankruptcy  Mount Laurel, NJ David D. Blake, Litigation - Insurance Barbara Davis, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Lynne Nahmani, Litigation - Health Care John H. Osorio, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants John L. Slimm, Legal Malpractice Law – Defendants; Professional Malpractice Law – Defendants Roseland, NJ Robert T. Evers, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Justin F. Johnson, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Julia Klubenspies, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Leonard C. Leicht, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Patricia M. McDonagh, Appellate Practice Sunny Sparano, Litigation - Construction Randall S. Watts, Health Care Law New York, NY Tonya M. Lindsey, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Tampa, FL Michael Archibald, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Lindsay G. McCormick, Litigation – Construction Orlando, FL Thomas F. Brown, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Dante C. Rohr, Commercial Litigation Fort Lauderdale, FL Kimberly Kanoff Berman, Appellate Practice Patrick M. Delong, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants Jacksonville, FL  Heather Byrer Carbone, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Linda Wagner Farrell, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Elizabeth B. Ferguson, Litigation - Construction James P. Hanratty, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants Wilmington, DE Sarah B. Cole, Litigation - Insurance Benjamin K. Durstein, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Maria R. Granaudo, Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants  Keri L. Morris-Johnston, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Cincinnati, OH Timothy B. Schenkel, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants David E. Williamson, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Cleveland, OH Vincent E. Cononico, Litigation – Insurance, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Jillian L. Dinehart, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants David J. Fagnilli, Insurance Law Jason P. Ferrante, Health Care Law, Litigation - Health Care Andrew H. Isakoff, Transportation Law Leslie M. Jenny, Litigation - Health Care; Medical Malpractice Law – Defendant OUR 2026 BEST LAWYERS: ONES TO WATCH Jacksonville, FL Sean J. Reeves, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Orlando, FL Carolin A. Pacheco, Insurance Law Mount Laurel Stacey Gorin, Insurance Law Melville, NY Kimberly Gitlin, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants Matthew A. Gray, Insurance Law; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Philadelphia, PA Holli K. Archer, Health Care Law; Medical Malpractice Law – Defendants; Professional Malpractice Law Emily Pritchyk, Commercial Litigation; Product Liability Litigation – Defendants Pittsburgh, PA Taylor E. Kosko, Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions – Defendants; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Alana Staniszewski, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers Michael D. Winsko, Product Liability Litigation – Defendants; Transportation Law King of Prussia, PA Richard Lechette, Commercial Litigation; Insurance Law, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants

Thought Leadership

The Ohio Supreme Court Extends Sham-Affidavit Rule to Contradictory Expert Reports

Legal Roundup: Ohio In its June 23, 2026, decision in Moore v. Mercy Medical Center, the Ohio Supreme Court upheld a trial court’s decision to strike an expert witness’s affidavit that contradicted the opinions expressed in the expert’s prior report. This case pertains to allegations of medical malpractice after plaintiff Cheri Moore gave birth to an infant in respiratory distress who required intubation. Moore alleged that a delay in ordering an emergency cesarean section resulted in the need for intubation, causing her child’s injuries. Specifically, Moore sued Dr. Meniru, who completed his first shift at 7:00 a.m. on May 28, 2015, and did not resume treating Moore until 7:00 a.m. on May 29, 2015. One of Moore’s expert witnesses authored a report stating that the doctors, including Dr. Meniru, deviated from the standard of care by not advocating for a cesarean section in the evening of May 28, 2015. Based on this report, Dr. Meniru moved for summary judgment, arguing that the alleged breach occurred during a period when he was not on duty. In response to the summary judgment motion, the plaintiff filed an affidavit from the same expert. Although the expert expressly incorporated his previous report into his affidavit, he also offered an additional opinion: that Dr. Meniru breached the standard of care by failing to begin a cesarean section within 30 minutes of receiving reports of fetal distress. Dr. Meniru filed a motion to strike the expert’s affidavit, arguing that it contradicted the opinions set forth in his prior report in violation of the sham-affidavit rule. The sham-affidavit rule applies to “a contradictory affidavit that indicates only that the affiant cannot maintain a consistent story, or is willing to offer a statement solely for the purpose of defeating summary judgment”. Moore, supra, at ¶ 19, citing Pettiford v. Aggarwal, 126 Ohio St.3d 413, 2010-Ohio-3237. The trial court granted both the motion to strike and the motion for summary judgment, and the Fifth District affirmed. The Ohio Supreme Court accepted two questions of law: (1) whether the sham-affidavit rule applies when the sworn testimony contradicts prior unsworn statements; and (2) whether an inconsistency within the affidavit goes to credibility or admissibility, justifying an order striking the affidavit. Previous rulings by the Ohio Supreme Court regarding the sham-affidavit rule have pertained to contradictions between an affidavit and sworn deposition testimony. See, e.g., Byrd v. Smith, 2006- Ohio-3455, 110 Ohio St.3d 24, 850 N.E.2d 47. However, here, the Court was asked to apply the same rule to contradictions between a sworn affidavit and an unsworn expert report. The Court held that, because Moore’s expert incorporated his prior report into his affidavit, he effectively adopted the report as part of his sworn testimony.

Result

No-Cause Jury Verdict Secured in Wrongful Death Trial

We successfully obtained a no-cause jury verdict in a 13-day wrongful death trial. The decedent, a 59-year-old man, was admitted to the emergency room on February 15, 2019, with complaints of abdominal pain, decreased appetite, and constipation, despite the use of laxatives. The patient did not complain of any nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. He had a significant medical history including diabetes, hypertension, prior coronary artery stenting, morbid obesity (with past gastric bypass surgery), longstanding ventral hernia, and back pain. A CT scan revealed multiple hernias and a potential closed-loop bowel obstruction, leading to a surgery consultation. Our client, an emergency general surgeon, interpreted that the patient did not have a closed loop or any significant obstruction and recommended non-surgical management. The patient was approved to have clear liquids, and had a vomiting incident shortly after, but our client was not notified. The patient was returned to NPO status, and after improving overnight, he was returned to “clears” and additional medical and renal consults were ordered. Our client did not receive any communications from the residents/nurses of any changes in the patient’s condition. On February 18, 2019, two rapid responses were called due to increased heart rate and vomiting. It is believed that the vomiting resulted in aspiration, causing sepsis, ultimately leading to the patient’s death. During the trial, the plaintiff’s sole medical expert highlighted imaging on the wrong hernia, which called into question all of his opinions in the case. We made key objections related to the expert testimony, limiting what the allegations were, and preventing new allegations from being made. After approximately two and a half hours of deliberating, the jury returned a no-cause verdict. 

Thought Leadership

Pennsylvania Superior Court Reaffirms Liberal Pleading Standard in Medical Malpractice Actions

Legal Roundup: Pennsylvania The Pennsylvania Superior Court has reinforced a broader fact-pleading approach that may make it more difficult for health care defendants to obtain dismissal at the preliminary objection stage. In DaSilva v. Abington Memorial Hospital, the court held that the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint satisfied Pennsylvania’s fact‑pleading requirements despite the absence of individually named negligent actors. In DaSilva, the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint alleging that Abington Memorial Hospital was directly and vicariously negligent after the patient, who was experiencing a mental health crisis, was left unattended by hospital staff, exited the emergency department, and was struck by a vehicle, suffering serious injuries. The trial court sustained the hospital’s preliminary objections and dismissed the complaint with prejudice, stating plaintiffs “failed to plead any material factual allegations in support of their claims of negligence [and] set forth vague allegations of negligence and unidentified agency.” Id. at *5. The plaintiffs appealed. On appeal, the Superior Court reversed, holding that the complaint sufficiently pled negligence and vicarious liability claims under Pa.R.C.P. 1019(a). The court concluded that allegations describing the patient’s condition, the hospital’s awareness of that condition, and the alleged failure to monitor or prevent elopement were adequate to satisfy Pennsylvania’s pleading requirements. Significantly, the court rejected the hospital’s argument that the complaint failed because it did not identify the specific employees responsible for the alleged negligence. Instead, the court found that generalized references to “emergency room staff” were sufficient to place the hospital on notice of the claims because “the names of those who performed services for the plaintiff are known to the defendant or can be ascertained during discovery.” Id. at *12 (citing Est. of Denmark ex rel. Hurst v. Williams, 117 A.3d 300, 307 (Pa. Super. 2015)). The effect of DaSilva is that plaintiffs may proceed past the pleading stage with relatively generalized allegations, particularly in cases involving institutional defendants where relevant details are uniquely within the defendant’s control. As a result, health care defendants should anticipate that challenges to claim sufficiency may be resolved in the later stages of litigation, including discovery and summary judgment.