.

Defense Digest

On the Pulse…Other Notable Achievements

Defense Digest, Vol. 29, No. 2, June 2023

June 1, 2023

RECOGNITION
Congratulations to Brigid Alford (Harrisburg, PA) on her selection to the Central Penn Business Journal’s 2023 Power List for Law! The honorees are some of the Central Pennsylvania region’s most significant, influential, and respected leaders in their fields, as chosen by the CPBJ’s editorial leadership team and readers. 

Mike Turner (Philadelphia, PA) was recently elected a Fellow of the International Academy of Trial Lawyers.

Clients Name Marshall Dennehey to the BTI Client Service 100
Marshall Dennehey has earned a coveted spot in the BTI Client Service 100 report, as recommended by corporate counsel. The report is based on research with more than 24,000 buyers of professional services, who rank firms according to performance of 17 activities that drive superior client relationships. Among the report’s findings, Marshall Dennehey was also one of only 50 law firms named to the BTI Midsize Client Service Masters list.

The survey is one of the leading measures of its kind. Rankings are purely research-driven and are not subject to law firm submissions, self-referrals, suggestions, or payments.

“At Marshall Dennehey, superior client service is our number one priority and it is gratifying that BTI’s data reflects that commitment,” said G. Mark Thompson, our firm’s president and CEO. “With every case and file that is entrusted to us, we seek to partner with our clients to understand their needs, effectively resolve their litigation, and exceed expectations. We are grateful to them for this recognition.” 

For more information about the report, please visit https://bticonsulting.com/bti-client-service-a-team. 

Marshall Dennehey Announces 2023 New Jersey Super Lawyers and Rising Stars
Eight attorneys from Marshall Dennehey’s Mount Laurel and Roseland, New Jersey offices have been selected to the 2023 edition of New Jersey Super Lawyers magazine. A Thomson Reuters business, Super Lawyers is a rating service of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement.

Each year, no more than five percent of the lawyers in the state are selected as Super Lawyers and no more than 2.5 percent are selected for Super Lawyer Rising Stars. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations. A description of the selection methodology can be found at http://www.superlawyers.com/about/selection_process.html. 

2023 New Jersey Super Lawyer
•    Robert T. Evers (Roseland, NJ): Personal Injury: Medical Malpractice Defense
2023 New Jersey Super Lawyer Rising Stars 
•    Ariel C. Brownstein (Mount Laurel, NJ): Insurance Coverage
•    Christopher J. DiCicco (Mount Laurel, NJ): Transportation/Maritime Litigation. 
•    Ryan Thomas Gannon (Roseland, NJ): Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice Defense. 
•    Heather M. LaBombardi (Roseland, NJ): Medical Malpractice Defense. 
•    Paul W. Lanza (Roseland, NJ): Personal Injury, General, Defense. 
•    Brian A. Rice (Mount Laurel, NJ): Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice Defense. 
•    Brielle K. Winkler (Mount Laurel, NJ): Insurance Coverage. 

 

OTHER NEWS
Jason Banonis (King of Prussia, PA), Pennsylvania Defense Institute’s past president, was recently appointed to Defense Research Institute’s State Legislation and Rules Task Force.

Stephanie Ransom, CLM, assistant office manager of our NYC and Roseland, NJ, offices, has been appointed Vice Chair of the Certification Committee at the Association of Legal Administrators (ALA). Stephanie was appointed to the committee last year and continues to rise in leadership in the national organization. 

Michael Salvati (Philadelphia, PA) has been selected to serve a five-year term on the Civil Jury Instructions Subcommittee of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. The subcommittee is charged with maintaining, overseeing and updating the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s standard civil jury instructions as facilitated and published by the Pennsylvania Bar Institute. 

 

PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Oner Kiziltan (Fort Lauderdale, FL) authored the article, “Proving Insurance Fraud: Is Metadata the Missing Piece of the SIU Puzzle?” in the March 24, 2023, edition of Insurance Journal. You can read his article here.

Jennifer Meyers’ (Westchester, NJ) article “When Is It Too Late to Change Your Theory of the Case?” was published in the March 10, 2023, issue of The New York Law Journal. You can read her article here.

Michael Salvati (Philadelphia, PA) published the article “A Two-Pronged Test Becomes One - Why the Superior Court’s Venue Decision in Hangey Departs from Decades of Prior Precedent,” appearing in the January/February 2023 issue of The Pennsylvania Lawyer. The article attracted the attention of Law360, who republished it (with permission), under the title, “Pa. Supreme Court Must Defend Established Venue Standard.” You can read his article here.  

Ray Michaud’s (Mount Laure, NJ) article “Develop the Helpful Habits to Ward Off Litigation” was published in the Spring 2023 issue of Pennsylvania CPA Journal, the publication of the Pennsylvania Institute of Certified Public Accountants. You can read Ray’s article here.  

Lauren Purcell and Patrick Reilly (Pittsburgh, PA) teamed up to author “Protecting Your Bar from Claims in the Wake of ‘Mortimer’,” which was published on February 15, 2023, in The Legal Intelligencer. You can read their article here.  

Dana Gittleman’s (Philadelphia, PA) article “4 Terms to Avoid When Advertising Your Insurance Agency,” was published on IndependentAgent.com on February 9, 2023. Click here to read her article.  

Steven Christman’s and Fabrice Michel’s (New York, NY) article “Prejudgment Interest Accruing from Date of Accident: What Will This Mean for Resident, Courts?” was published in the April 13, 2023, issue of New York Law Journal. You can read their article here. 

Hunter McMullin’s (Philadelphia, PA) article “Potential Clarity on Pennsylvania’s Murky Products Liability Landscape,” was published in the April 6, 2023, edition of The Legal Intelligencer. You can read his article here.  

Michele Punturi’s (Philadelphia, PA) article “Why Contest Mental Health Claims in Workers’ Comp When You Can Prevent Them to Begin With?” was published in the March 28, 2023, issue of Risk & Insurance. You can read Michele’s article here.

Paul Laughlin (King of Prussia, PA) authored the article “Choosing a Mediator for Your Medical Malpractice Case: One Size Does Not Fit All,” appearing in The Legal Intelligencer’s Medical Malpractice Supplement, published on March 28, 2023. You can read the article here.  

William Murphy’s (Roseland, NJ) article “Under the Influence of the Intoxication Defense: Differing State Law Can Affect Workers’ Compensation Claims for Workplace Injuries” was published in the April 2023 edition of CLM Magazine. You can read his article here. 

Greg Graham and Carly Edman (Pittsburgh, PA) authored the article “Retooling the Client Engagement Letter to Minimize Liability Claim Exposure,” appearing in the March 23, 2023, edition of PLUS Blog, the blog of the Professional Liability Underwriting Society. You may read the article at this link.  

Josh Byrne and Alesia Sulock (Philadelphia, PA) authored the article, “When Disciplinary Counsel Knocks on Your Door, How Do You Respond?” in the March 20, 2023, issue of The Legal Intelligencer. Read the article here.  

“Top Ten Ways an Insurance Broker Can Avoid Liability,” by Estelle Kokales McGrath (Pittsburgh, PA) was published by the National Association of Professional Agents on March 1, 2023. You can read her article here.

 

SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
Matthew Keris (Scranton, PA) presented “Radonda Vaught Lessons: The Ethical Challenges of Managing Dual Legal Investigations” at the DRI Medical Liability and Health Care Law Seminar. Matthew also presented the American Legal Connections webinar “Best Practices for an Audit Trail Expert Deposition.”

Jeffrey Rapattoni (Mount Laurel, NJ) participated in two seminars at the annual Insurance Fraud Management Conference. Jeff moderated “Legal Update Panel” and participated in “Identification of SIU Suggested Best Practices.”

Raymond Michaud (Mount Laurel, NJ) spoke at the New Jersey Chapter of the American Water Works Association Annual Conference. His presentation, “Case Studies in Ethics for Engineers,” focused on the water crisis in Flint, Michigan and the ethical behaviors of engineers.

Jon Cross (Philadelphia, PA), Christopher DiCicco (Mount Laurel, NJ), Jay Hamad (New York, NY), A.C. Nash (Fort Lauderdale, FL), David Shannon (Philadelphia, PA), Robin Snyder (Philadelphia, PA), and Sunny Sparano (Roseland, NJ) recently participated in ILG 360° London Annual Conference 2023. Our attorneys presented practice area-specific webinars in areas such as concussion litigation, aviation, cyber risk and systemic threats, changes in the construction industry, marine cargo claims and claims inflation in property and casualty litigation. All of our presenters guided participants through case studies and interactive sessions, addressing key issues of importance to claims professionals and insurance industry personnel. For background, Marshall Dennehey is a founding member of Insurance Law Global (ILG), a multi-jurisdictional network of like-minded independent insurance defense law firms. The network is committed to helping clients respond to the challenges and opportunities presented by globalization and the increasingly diverse needs of the insurance industry. You can watch the conference in its entirety here: https://www.ourevent.tv/ilg23. 

John Hare (Philadelphia, PA) spoke at the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s annual Civil Litigation Update. John spoke on notable case law and procedural rule developments over the past year.

Brooks Foland (Harrisburg, PA) presented “The Mediator’s Role as Convener” at the Pennsylvania Council of Mediators 35th Annual Conference in Harrisburg.

Janice Merrill (Orlando, FL) presented at the Orlando Health Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society meeting on the “Pitfalls of Pressure Injury Litigation.”

Mohamad Bakry (Philadelphia, PA) co-presented “Power Jackpots and Life Care Plans: What’s the Difference and What Can Be Done About It?” at the FDCC winter meeting. This panel discussed a survey of trends that defense counsel are seeing in life care plans, assessed techniques for challenging the underlying assumptions of those plans, and explained how to defend against these huge damages claims. 

Thomas Brown (Orlando, FL) discussed carshare and rideshare liability issues and best practices for defending against claims at the Florida Defense Lawyers Association’s webinar.

Jack Delany (Philadelphia, PA), an adjunct professor at Temple Law School’s Trial Advocacy Program LLM, presented “Nuts and Bolts Trial Strategy in a Post-COVID, Social Unrest, and Nuclear Verdict Time Period.”

Harold Moroknek (Westchester, NY) and Preston Holmes (Westchester, NJ) presented “What To Do When Stopped by Law Enforcement” at the American Bus Association, The Bus Industry Safety Council meeting.

A.C. Nash (Fort Lauderdale, FL) office joined a panel at the International Association of Professional Security Consultants (IAPSC) conference, where he discussed “Testimony from Intake to Trial.” The presentation took security experts through the stages of a new case, addressing intake, investigation, formulating opinions, and testifying at trial. 

Elizabeth Ferguson (Jacksonville, FL) presented “Can We Have It All?” at the Florida Bar Construction Law Institute’s Women in Construction Networking Breakfast.

John Hare (Philadelphia, PA) presented a seminar on civil litigation developments for the Pennsylvania Coalition for Civil Justice Reform. The seminar was held at the Pennsylvania Manufacturers Association facility in Harrisburg and was attended by representatives from more than forty insurance carriers and corporations.

James Cole (Philadelphia, PA) presented “Untying Tangled Titles – Recognizing How Property Title Issues Drive Fraud” at the 2023 Pennsylvania Insurance Fraud Conference.

James Cole (Philadelphia, PA), Jeffrey Rapattoni (Mount Laurel, NJ), and Christopher Woodward (Harrisburg, PA) were featured speakers at the 2023 Pennsylvania Insurance Fraud Conference. Presented by IASIU (Delaware Valley and Greater Pittsburgh Chapters) and the Pennsylvania Insurance Fraud Prevention Authority (IFPA), Jim and Chris presented “Untying Tangled Titles – How Property Insurance Drives Fraud,” and Jeff presented a “Legal Update.” 

Jack Slimm and Jeremy Zacharias (Mount Laurel, NJ) presented at the Camden County Bar Association’s Civil Practice Update. Jack presented on various updates pertaining to Legal Malpractice Liability and Expert Strategy Parameters in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Accutane. Jeremy presented on recent updates pertaining to the Affidavit of Merit Statute and case application and also moderated this panel discussion, which included various members of the bench and the bar in Camden County. The seminar was well attended and is considered a seminal event within the Camden County Bar Association. 

Josh J.T. Byrne (Philadelphia, PA) participated in the presentation “Ethics and Malpractice Avoidance” at the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Mid-Year Meeting along with Justice Sallie Updyke Mundy and Michael Furlong of CNA. Josh also presented at the Philadelphia Bar Association’s Bench-Bar meeting on “Practicing with Integrity” with Chief Disciplinary Counsel Thomas Farrell, Judge Tiffany Palmer, and Judicial Candidate Kay Yu.

Shannon Fellin and Katherine Bavoso (Harrisburg, PA) were speakers at the Workers’ Compensation Bench and Bar Best Practices 2023 forum. They joined a panel of distinguished industry professionals to discuss “Ethics, Professionalism, Civility, & Culture.” 

Michele Punturi (Philadelphia, PA) participated in a panel discussion at the CLM Annual Conference. The panel focused on increasing diversity and sustaining organizational change in the claims industry. In “Building a Better Business, Achieving a More Diverse Future,” the panelists talked about how diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts have taken center stage in the workplace and identified emerging recruitment and retention strategies that employers can utilize to achieve a more diverse future. The session also included an analysis of effective ways to maintain diverse vendor teams while building stronger partnerships in claims handling in the legal industry. 

Frank Wickersham (King of Prussia, PA) presented at the 19th Annual Worker’s Compensation Insurance ExecuSummit. In his “State of the Union - Medical Marijuana,” Frank discussed the ongoing efforts around the nation, via lawsuits and legislation, to obtain clarity on medical marijuana coverage for injured workers. Frank also co-presented “One Less Zombie in the Workers’ Compensation Apocalypse” at the CLM 2023 Workers’ Compensation, Casualty & Risk Management Conference. This seminar addressed strategies for dealing with the relentless issue of opioids and the growing reliance on cannabis in workers’ compensation.

Heather Carbone (Jacksonville, FL) was the keynote speaker at the 2023 International Association of Rehabilitation Professionals (IARP) Annual Southeast Florida Workers’ Compensation Claims Conference. Heather’s topic was “Talking About Generations.”
 

 

Defense Digest, Vol. 29, No. 2, June 2023, is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1. © 2023 Marshall Dennehey. All Rights Reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm. For reprints, contact tamontemuro@mdwcg.com.

Firm Highlights

Thought Leadership

U.S. Supreme Court Decides Key Issue Regarding Interstate Freight Broker Liability

Freight brokers are intermediaries.  They connect shippers of goods with trucking companies that transport those goods.  Freight brokers match a load of freight with a trucking company and oversee the logistics of the transportation. For a number of years there has been a division among the Federal Circuits regarding the potential liability of freight brokers when the trucking companies that they retain for interstate loads are involved in accidents.  At the center of this division was the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA).  Some Federal Circuit Courts have held that state law negligent hiring claims against freight brokers were preempted by the FAAAA .  Other Federal Circuits Courts have held that even if preemption applied, the “safety exception” in the FAAAA saved state law negligent hiring claims from federal preemption.  On May 14, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the conflict in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, et al, No24-1238. In that case freight broker C.H. Robinson selected Caribe Transport to haul an interstate load. The commercial truck driver employed by Caribe Transport allegedly caused an accident and the plaintiff, Montgomery, was seriously injured. Montgomery brought an action against the driver, Caribe Transport and C.H. Robinson. The allegation against C.H. Robinson was that it negligently retained Caribe Transport when it knew, or should have known, that it was an unsafe company. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that Montgomery’s claims against C.H. Robinson were preempted by the FAAAA. The plaintiff appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.  The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision focused primarily on the safety exception in the FAAAA.  That provision provides that the FAAAA preemption “…shall not restrict the safety regulatory authority of a State with respect to motor vehicles.” C.H. Robinson argued, as freight brokers historically have, that their function was not “with respect to motor vehicles” because they do not own trucks or employ drivers. They are merely intermediaries, connecting entities who need freight moved with entities who can do that job. Therefore, C.H. Robinson argued that preemption applied, not the safety exception. The U.S. Supreme Court did not accept that argument. The Court focused on the meaning of the phrase “with respect to” in the safety exception. The Court held that it means “referring to”, “concerning” or “regarding”. Therefore, writing for a unanimous Court, Justice Barrett concluded that “[r]equiring C.H. Robinson to exercise ordinary care in selecting a carrier therefore “concerns” motor vehicles—most obviously, the trucks that will transport the goods. So, Montgomery’s negligent-hiring claim falls within the FAAAA’s safety exception, which saves it from preemption.” Justice Kavanaugh, in his concurring opinion, noted the effect this ruling may have on freight brokers and their insurers throughout the country: Importantly, the Court's decision today should not be read to mean that brokers will routinely be subject to state tort liability in the wake of truck accidents. As even plaintiff's counsel stressed, brokers should be able to successfully defend against state tort suits if the brokers have acted reasonably and arranged transportation with reputable trucking companies. Tr. of Oral Arg. 27-29. In plaintiff's counsel's words, the brokers "just have to hire carriers that actually have a reasonable policy," and "the broker is not going to have a problem if it's asking the hard questions of the carrier." Id., at 42, 45. In addition, the proximate-cause requirement in typical state tort law should help protect brokers from excessive liability. Id., at 25. That said, the brokers rightly caution against naivete. In the real world, as the brokers forcefully respond, state tort law can be unpredictable, and the costs to brokers of litigation and insurance may be significant even when brokers prevail in lawsuits. Moreover, the costs of litigation and insurance, as well as the costs of brokers' conducting more substantial inquiries into trucking companies, will cascade through the economy and be paid in part by American consumers in the form of higher prices. The concerns expressed by the brokers are legitimate and weighty. The key point here is that freight brokers can no longer claim they are protected from negligent retention claims by the FAAAA (in cases involving interstate transportation). The challenge will be to determine what is considered ”reasonable efforts” used by brokers when retaining transportation companies. 

Thought Leadership

Marijuana Legalization and Workplace Risk: What New Jersey Employers Need to Know

While the legalization of recreational marijuana usage poses a risk of increased work-related accidents for younger workers, employers can work to curb this increase by investing in education, effective drug policies, and employee assistance programs.

Result

Summary Judgment Secured, Preserving $750,000 in Coverage for Insured in Major Trucking Liability Dispute

Ray Freudiger and Michael A. Roberts (both of Cincinnati) successfully obtained summary judgment on behalf of their client in a coverage dispute arising from a May 19, 2022, motor vehicle accident. A permissive driver operated a box truck for an interstate trucking company and caused severe injuries to two tort victims. Prior to the accident, the insured had procured a commercial auto policy for the trucking company with stated limits of $1,000,000. Following the accident, the insurer initiated a declaratory judgment action asserting that only reduced bodily injury limits of $25,000/$50,000 applied and later counterclaimed, alleging it would not have insured the driver had he been properly submitted for approval under the policy. After extensive discovery, briefing, and oral argument, the court rejected the insurer’s attempt to shift responsibility for the $750,000 in coverage it was legally required to provide for permissive drivers under Ohio law, granting summary judgment in favor of the insured and preserving $750,000 in liability exposure.

News

Christina Gonzales To Speak at the Women of Color Roundtable at DRI’s Diversity and Inclusion Seminar

graphic with Maria Granaudo photo text announces she has joined the firm as a shareholder in the Health Care Dept.

News

Maria R. Granaudo Joins Marshall Dennehey’s Wilmington Office As a Shareholder in the Health Care Department

News

Marshall Dennehey Again Earns Recognition in Distinguished Chambers USA

Event

29th Annual FDLA Florida Liability Claims Conference

Jim and Erica will team up to present, "Supporting the Next Generation: Connecting with Associates." This panel-style presentation will explore communication best practices from the perspective of a senior shareholder and newer associate. The discussion will focus on the communication styles of different generations and effective strategies to avoid communication breakdowns. Topics to be discussed include the hiring process, perceptions of defense work among newer lawyers, work-life balance issues after hiring, and mentoring.

Result

No-Cause Jury Verdict Secured in Wrongful Death Trial

We successfully obtained a no-cause jury verdict in a 13-day wrongful death trial. The decedent, a 59-year-old man, was admitted to the emergency room on February 15, 2019, with complaints of abdominal pain, decreased appetite, and constipation, despite the use of laxatives. The patient did not complain of any nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. He had a significant medical history including diabetes, hypertension, prior coronary artery stenting, morbid obesity (with past gastric bypass surgery), longstanding ventral hernia, and back pain. A CT scan revealed multiple hernias and a potential closed-loop bowel obstruction, leading to a surgery consultation. Our client, an emergency general surgeon, interpreted that the patient did not have a closed loop or any significant obstruction and recommended non-surgical management. The patient was approved to have clear liquids, and had a vomiting incident shortly after, but our client was not notified. The patient was returned to NPO status, and after improving overnight, he was returned to “clears” and additional medical and renal consults were ordered. Our client did not receive any communications from the residents/nurses of any changes in the patient’s condition. On February 18, 2019, two rapid responses were called due to increased heart rate and vomiting. It is believed that the vomiting resulted in aspiration, causing sepsis, ultimately leading to the patient’s death. During the trial, the plaintiff’s sole medical expert highlighted imaging on the wrong hernia, which called into question all of his opinions in the case. We made key objections related to the expert testimony, limiting what the allegations were, and preventing new allegations from being made. After approximately two and a half hours of deliberating, the jury returned a no-cause verdict. 

Thought Leadership

PA Middle District Dismisses Claims Against School District and its Superintendent, Principal, Special Education Director, and Classroom Teacher

A five-year-old special education student was enrolled in the Wyoming Valley West School District and attended the State Street Elementary School during the 2024-2025 school year. The student refused to clean up classroom toys at dismissal. When his teacher allegedly grabbed him by the wrist to walk him back to his seat, the student dropped to the floor and began crying. The teacher then allegedly grabbed the student by the ankle and dragged him across the floor. Following an investigation, criminal charges were not advanced by the county DA, and the school permitted the teacher to return to the classroom. The student’s parents sued, lodging thirteen legal counts under both state and federal law, which sought monetary damages from the teacher, the school district, the superintendent, the principal, and the director of special education. The plaintiff’s 42 USC 1983 claims were dismissed as to the school district for failure to allege a policy or custom violation, and the failure to alleged deliberate indifference in the failure-to-train context. As to the superintendent, building principal, and special education director, the Section 1983 claims were also dismissed for failure to allege personal involvement on the part of the individuals. Regarding an equal protection claim asserted against all defendants, the motion to dismiss was also granted for a failure to advance a plausible equal protection claim, holding that “plaintiffs' single-act allegations do not include a factual basis to even infer that the act was motivated by discriminatory animus rather than some other non-discriminatory impulse.” The court further dismissed the plaintiff’s negligence-based claims including negligence against the teacher and district administrators, NIED, and vicarious liability under the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act (PSTCA). The federal claims under the IDEA, Section 504, and the ADA were also dismissed in various respects. The IDEA claim was dismissed against all defendants with prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Section 504 claims against the individual defendants were also dismissed with prejudice, as districts, not individuals, are the recipients of federal funds under Section 504. However, the Section 504 and ADA claims were dismissed without prejudice as to defendant Wyoming Valley West, and the plaintiff was permitted leave to amend.

blue facade of a hospital sign against blue sky

Result

Defense Verdict in Complex Medical Malpractice Trial