Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Professional Liability

The growth, tenacity and creativity of the plaintiffs' bar has ushered in a new wave of matters sounding in professional liability. To meet the needs of our clients, Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin has responded with a team of lawyers devoted exclusively to defending professionals. Our professional liability practice is broad-based and includes many senior attorneys who have significant experience in the defense of large exposure, politically-sensitive and complex cases. An analysis committee examines each case to ensure its proper assignment within our group.
 
Our Professional Liability Practice Group services a broad client base, including, but not limited to:

  • Abstractors
  • Accountants
  • Actuaries
  • Architects
  • Brokers/Dealers
  • Clergy
  • Debt collectors
  • Engineers
  • Financial planners
  • Financial professionals
  • Financial services outsourcing solution providers
  • Information technology advisors
  • Insurance brokers/agents
  • Investment advisors
  • Investment professionals
  • Lawyers
  • Mediators
  • Mortgage brokers
  • Mutual fund and hedge fund administrators
  • Private trust companies
  • Real estate agents and brokers
  • Stockbrokers
  • Title agents
  • Travel agents

 
We also defend fiduciary liability matters, corporate directors and officers, and ERISA claims. In addition to professional liability matters before state and federal courts, we defend financial planners, investment professionals, and brokers and broker-dealers before self-regulatory organizations (SROs). We also handle securities arbitration claims before FINRA, AAA and other SROs. In addition, the group litigates commercial matters including employment disputes, trade secrets, bank litigation, and surety, fidelity and performance bonds.
 
Our offices are centrally linked by state-of-the-art computer networking. Our clients realize added value from our extensive network of offices: travel time is sharply reduced and the attorneys working out of these offices and living in these respective areas are intimately familiar with local practice and enjoy a good rapport with the judges before whom they frequently appear.
 
Recognizing the need for a cost-effective approach to the defense of professionals, our firm is dedicated to providing our clients with quality, timely and economical service. We are on the cutting edge in developing innovative and alternative billing practices.
 
The Professional Liability Practice Group serves clients in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Tampa, Orlando, Jacksonville, Ft. Lauderdale and communities throughout Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Ohio, Florida and New York.
 
We would welcome the opportunity to work with you in handling your professional liability litigation. We are also available to conduct presentations or training seminars at your location, or at one of our eighteen offices. 

Case Study February 8, 2013

Pages

Aug 30, 2010
Attorneys obtained a defense verdict on behalf of an Attorney in a legal malpractice case. The underlying action involved a medical malpractice claim initially filed by an attorney based on an extremely limited theory of negligence. Following the...
Aug 23, 2010
Attorneys received a victory in the state Appellate Division. The case was a legal malpractice case brought against our client, a matrimonial attorney, by a disgruntled former client who, after being sued to recover the attorney's fee, countersued...
Aug 23, 2010
Attorneys obtained summary judgment in a legal malpractice case where our client defended a wealthy landlord who as convicted of laundering drug proceeds from the Junior Black Mafia and was sentenced to ten years in federal prison. He sued his...
Aug 2, 2010
Attorneys obtained a dismissal of all claims asserted against our clients, a lawyer and the social service agency she worked for, by way of Preliminary Objections. Plaintiff, a divorced father of two, alleged in a Complaint f, that our clients are...
Aug 2, 2010
Attorneys obtained an order of dismissal with prejudice on a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on behalf of an accounting firm. Plaintiffs filed a Certificate of Merit indicating that "expert testimony is unnecessary" for prosecution of its...
Jul 19, 2010
Attorneys obtained summary judgment for a local law firm on a professional malpractice counterclaim. Our client brought suit for recovery of outstanding legal fees and the defendant filed a counterclaim alleging professional negligence and breach...
Jun 21, 2010
Attorneys argued the summary judgment motion in a case of first impression, involving the issue of whether a law firm, as opposed to individual attorneys, are entitled the beneficial screening function provided by an Affidavit of Merit. Plaintiff...
May 17, 2010
Attorneys obtained summary judgment in a Dragonetti case on behalf of their attorney clients. Plaintiffs alleged that the attorneys wrongfully initiated and continued legal proceedings against them. In the underlying case, the plaintiff, with the...
May 17, 2010
Attorney successfully defended an appeal of a Summary Judgment he obtained in a legal malpractice action arising out of the attorney's representation of the client on an appeal arising out of a loan sharking conviction. The plaintiff alleged that...
Mar 21, 2010
Attorney obtained a dismissal of a professional negligence and civil rights claim . Plaintiff was injured when the ATV he was operating on a state-owned road was overturned by a State Police Officer, who was pursuing plaintiff for suspected...

Pages

Pages

Law Alerts April 11, 2013
The broker secured windstorm coverage for the condominium association through an insurance company. The association's condominium was damaged by hurricanes. It proceeded with expensive remediation efforts after the broker assured it that the..., Case Law Alerts - 2nd Quarter 2013
Law Alerts April 11, 2013
In this legal malpractice action, the attorney-defendant appealed a jury verdict entered against her in favor of the plaintiff, her former client in underlying divorce and support proceedings. The plaintiff alleged that the attorney-defendant failed..., Case Law Alerts - 2nd Quarter 2013
Law Alerts April 11, 2013
In this legal malpractice action, the plaintiffs set forth a claim for breach of contract arising from an underlying stock purchase agreement, wherein the plaintiffs erroneously believed, based upon attorney-defendants' advice, that the sale..., Case Law Alerts - 2nd Quarter 2013
Defense Digest Article March 1, 2013
By John L. Slimm, Esq.*   Key Points: Litigation privilege limited by New Jersey court. Litigation privilege does not apply to a client's malpractice claims against his/her attorney where it is claimed that the attorney..., Defense Digest, Vol. 19, No. 1, March 2013
Defense Digest Article March 1, 2013
By Nicole M. Ehrhart, Esq.*   Key Points: Superior Court expands damages in legal malpractice actions in assumpsit. Potential damages now may include actual losses sustained.   Albeit in a non-precedential decision, the..., Defense Digest, Vol. 19, No. 1, March 2013
Case Study February 8, 2013
Law Alerts January 24, 2013
On Friday, January 18, 2013, James E. Boasberg of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted a Motion for Summary Judgment in which the Court ruled that the IRS lacks statutory authority to promulgate or enforce the new...
Law Alerts January 11, 2013
The plaintiff noticed an advertisement to invest in a real estate project located in Vietnam. The advertising newspaper and person introduced the plaintiff to two other co-investors and attorney Michael Song, Esq. for the purpose of his acting as..., Case Law Alert - 1st Quarter 2013
Law Alerts January 11, 2013
The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly dismissed the plaintiff's, Buchanan, claim for malpractice against the attorneys who represented him in the underlying matter. Buchanan represented the Kerrs in filing for bankruptcy...., Case Law Alert - 1st Quarter 2013
Law Alerts January 11, 2013
The plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed on a motion based upon her failure to produce expert opinion regarding the standard of professional care applicable to the defendants in the course of their representation of plaintiff in the purchase of..., Case Law Alert - 1st Quarter 2013

Pages

Chair

Christopher E. Dougherty
Director - Professional Liability Department
(215) 575-2733
cedougherty@mdwcg.com

Please read the following disclaimer:

Thank you for your interest in our firm. The information contained on this Website contains statements, videos and other content about the type and quality of services offered by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, as well as past results and testimonials about the firm. This information has not been reviewed nor approved by the Florida Bar.

  • The facts and circumstances of your case may differ from the matters in which results and/or testimonials have been provided.
  • All results of cases handled by the firm are not provided and not all clients have given testimonials.
  • The results and testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by any individual attorney or by the firm nor of the experience of all clients or others with the firm. Every case is different, and each client's case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.


Please acknowledge that you have read the above disclaimer by clicking on one of the two links below.

YES I have read and understand the above statements. I am interested in learning more about Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. NO I do not want to view the information.

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."