Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Amusements, Sports and Recreation Liability

Marshall Dennehey's Amusement, Sports and Recreation Practice Group is nationally recognized.  The firm's clients are involved in virtually every aspect of the broad field of amusement, sports and entertainment, from theme parks, water parks and professional sports teams to small carnivals and local skating centers.
 
Litigators in our practice group have made amusement, sports and entertainment a principal focus of their practice for over 20 years.  Our litigators publish and lecture frequently in their areas of concentration and provide commentary in the print and broadcast media on breaking legal stories.  Our involvement in standards development provides us with advance information on emerging standards and legal requirements for our amusement clients.
 
Our litigation defense attorneys are members of industry, trade and professional organizations including the International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions (IAAPA), the Outdoor Amusement Business Association (OABA), the National Association of Ride Safety Officials (NAARSO), the Ice Skating Institute of America (ISIA), the New Jersey Amusement Association (NJAA), the Pennsylvania Amusement Park Association (PAPA), the World Waterpark Association (WWA), the International Recreational Go-Kart Association (IRGA) and the American Society of Testing and Material (ASTM) F24 Committee on Amusement Rides and Devices.
 
Many of the lawyers in our group have positions of leadership in the amusement, sports and entertainment industry.
 

  • Counsel to the New Jersey Amusement Association
  • Member of the IAAPA Government Relations Committee
  • State-licensed soccer coaches
  • Counsel to the International Recreational Go-Kart Association
  • Member of the Risk Management Committee of the Roller Skating Association International
  • Member of the editorial board of Inflatable News Magazine
  • Member of the New Jersey Governor's Commission on Amusement Liability

 
The Amusement, Sports and Recreation Practice Group is unique in many ways that distinguish us from our peers.
 

  • An important asset to our litigation defense group has been membership in the International Amusement and Leisure Defense Association, Inc. (IALDA), a network of defense counsel and insurance professionals who concentrate their practices in the sports and entertainment field.  IALDA members communicate confidentially regarding expert witnesses and other defense resources throughout the United States and Canada.
  • Our litigators have played an innovative role in the development of national insurance programs in the amusement industry.  Program administrators have relied on our expertise for drafting risk management guidelines, and designing accident investigation and loss control programs.  Most recently, we served as national counsel to the insurance program endorsed by the Roller Skating Association International.
  • Our amusement industry clients have turned to us for advice on compliance with federal and state laws governing the amusement workplace.  We have advised clients on compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act and developed programs to deal with the problem of sexual harassment in the workplace.

 
A representative sample of our clients is available upon request.
 
The Amusement, Sports and Recreation Practice Group serves clients in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Tampa, Orlando, Jacksonville, Ft. Lauderdale, and communities throughout Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Ohio, Florida and New York.

Pages

Sep 26, 2011
Attorneys' persuaded the District Court of Appeals to affirm summary judgment entered on behalf of the defendant-owner and operator of a motocross track-on a claim that negligent maintenance and design of a jump on the track caused the plaintiff,...
Sep 8, 2011
Attorneys' obtained a dismissal with prejudice in a lawsuit that garnered international media attention and in which plaintiffs made repeated television appearances, including all three network morning shows. Parents brought suit on behalf of their...
May 16, 2011
Attorney recently obtained a defense verdict in favor of a bowling center in a four-day jury trial. Plaintiff alleged she fell due to an unidentified condition on a bowling lane approach supposedly created by regular lane stripping and oiling...
Aug 2, 2010
Attorney obtainied Summary Judgment on behalf of our roller skating rink client. The plaintiff claimed that he was skating in the carpeted locker area when his skate became caught on a portion of the floor where the carpet had peeled away. He fell...
Jun 28, 2010
Attorneys' were successful in their representation of a bike trail. The attorneys' obtained a summary judgment of no liability when the judge ruled that Plaintiff, a chiropractor and recreational trail bike enthusiast, could not recover for injuries...
Jun 14, 2010
Attorney obtained a defense verdict in which Plaintiff fell from a single step at a darkened concert at a ballroom. As a result, she fractured her ankle and shortly thereafter RSD set in. The trial lasted four and a half days and after 30 minutes...
Dec 30, 2009
Attorney obtained a defense verdict in the case in which he represented a large entertainment corporation.  The plaintiff was a seven year old girl who had sustained a two inch facial laceration with scarring revised by plastic surgery that resulted...
Jul 13, 2009
Attorney obtained a summary judgment in a brain injury case, in favor of her client, the operator of a motocross track, against the plaintiff who had an accident while participating in a motocross race.   All experts, including those retained by the...
May 27, 2008
Attorney obtained a "no cause" following a week long jury trial on behalf of a concert arena. Plaintiff sustained a broken hip resulting in two surgeries, the second being a total hip replacement, when she was knocked down at the defendant's arena...
Apr 17, 2008
Attorneys succeeded in appellate court when the court reversed a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Plaintiff was impaled on the steering wheel when she drove a go-kart at full speed, head first into a retaining barrier. Plaintiff argued the...

Pages

Defense Digest Article March 1, 2013
By Samuel G. Casolari Jr., Esq.*   Key Points: The Ohio Supreme Court reinforces primary assumption of risk doctrine. The Ohio Supreme Court finds that a collision between skiers is an inherent risk of the act of skiing...., Defense Digest, Vol. 19, No. 1, March 2013
Defense Digest Article March 1, 2010
New Jersey - Amusements, Sports & Entertainment , Key Points: A modern digital camera system can be very useful in disproving bogus liability claims in roller skating rinks or any facility where sports or recreation activities are conducted. Video..., Defense Digest, Vol. 16, No. 1, March 2010
Defense Digest Article September 1, 2009
Marshall Dennehey's Amusements, Sports & Entertainment Practice Group is nationally recognized for our depth and experience in a wide range of amusement, sports and leisure risks, including sports and amusement facilities, arenas and concert..., Defense Digest, Vol. 15, No. 3, September 2009

Chair

Lary I. Zucker
Chair, Amusements, Sports and Recreation Practice Group
(856) 414-6001
lizucker@mdwcg.com

Co-Chair

Howard P. Dwoskin
Assistant Director, Casualty Department
(215) 575-2664
hpdwoskin@mdwcg.com

Related Practice Areas

Please read the following disclaimer:

Thank you for your interest in our firm. The information contained on this Website contains statements, videos and other content about the type and quality of services offered by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, as well as past results and testimonials about the firm. This information has not been reviewed nor approved by the Florida Bar.

  • The facts and circumstances of your case may differ from the matters in which results and/or testimonials have been provided.
  • All results of cases handled by the firm are not provided and not all clients have given testimonials.
  • The results and testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by any individual attorney or by the firm nor of the experience of all clients or others with the firm. Every case is different, and each client's case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.


Please acknowledge that you have read the above disclaimer by clicking on one of the two links below.

YES I have read and understand the above statements. I am interested in learning more about Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. NO I do not want to view the information.

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."