Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Practice Area Articles

Start Date
E.g., 2013-06-19
End Date
E.g., 2013-06-19
State
Author
Practice Area
Keyword
Article Category

Pages

Law Alerts • July 1, 2010
The Supreme Court of New Jersey allowed a legal malpractice suit to go forward in a ruling that clarified the circumstances in which clients who become disenchanted with settlements can sue their attorneys for negligence. In Guido v. Duane Morris, a..., Case Law Alert - 3rd Qtr 2010
Read More >>
Law Alerts • July 1, 2010
The plaintiff had a history of depression and was taking medicine which made her fall into a deep sleep and from which she had difficulty awakening in the morning. The plaintiff sought permission to report to work 15-30 minutes late and to be..., Case Law Alert - 3rd Qtr 2010
Read More >>
Law Alerts • July 1, 2010
The employer challenged the imposition of a penalty for violating the Act for failing to pay medical bills which were determined by a utilization review to be reasonable and necessary during the time that the employer's UR Review Petition was in...
Read More >>
Law Alerts • July 1, 2010
The plaintiff alleged sex and sexual orientation discrimination and retaliation stemming from her employment with New Jersey Transit. In discovery the plaintiff sought various reports prepared by New Jersey Transit concerning the analysis of..., Case Law Alert - 3rd Qtr 2010
Read More >>
Law Alerts • July 1, 2010
This action arises out of a motor vehicle accident in which the plaintiff claimed to have suffered damages for bodily injuries and subsequent medical treatment. The petitioner hospital, a non-party, sought certiorari relief of an order from the..., Case Law Alert - 3rd Qtr 2010
Read More >>
Law Alerts • July 1, 2010
The plaintiff, insured by codefendant State Farm, was injured while driving a car owned by his employer. He received the bodily injury liability coverage limit under the tortfeasor's insurance policy and settled with his workers' compensation..., Case Law Alert - 3rd Qtr 2010
Read More >>
Law Alerts • July 1, 2010
The claimant injured his left shoulder on April 22, 2008, while working as a driver for the employer. The injury was accepted as compensable, and the claimant began receiving compensation for total disability at the rate of $503.73 per week based on...
Read More >>
Law Alerts • July 1, 2010
The plaintiff, a depressed insomniac, was prescribed Zoloft and Ambien. The defendant was a board certified physician in emergency medicine but practicing family medicine. The plaintiff took the Ambien and fell asleep while "inspecting his .38..., Case Law Alert - 3rd Qtr 2010
Read More >>
Law Alerts • July 1, 2010
After working for the college for 26 years, and under a number of consecutive contracts, the plaintiff was advised that her contract of employment would not be renewed. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination..., Case Law Alert - 3rd Qtr 2010
Read More >>
Law Alerts • July 1, 2010
The owner of a mobile home park alleged Township officials vexatiously acted to prevent him from expanding and further developing the park in violation of his constitutional right to use and develop his property. The owner also alleged that the..., Case Law Alert - 3rd Qtr 2010
Read More >>

Pages

© 2013 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1

Please read the following disclaimer:

Thank you for your interest in our firm. The information contained on this Website contains statements, videos and other content about the type and quality of services offered by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, as well as past results and testimonials about the firm. This information has not been reviewed nor approved by the Florida Bar.

  • The facts and circumstances of your case may differ from the matters in which results and/or testimonials have been provided.
  • All results of cases handled by the firm are not provided and not all clients have given testimonials.
  • The results and testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by any individual attorney or by the firm nor of the experience of all clients or others with the firm. Every case is different, and each client's case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.


Please acknowledge that you have read the above disclaimer by clicking on one of the two links below.

YES I have read and understand the above statements. I am interested in learning more about Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. NO I do not want to view the information.

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."