Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Practice Area Articles

Start Date
E.g., 2013-06-19
End Date
E.g., 2013-06-19
State
Author
Practice Area
Keyword
Article Category

Pages

Law Alerts • October 1, 2010
The issue in this case was whether the claimant was within the scope of employment when she had an adverse reaction and fell while undergoing a tuberculin test required as part of the application for work with the employer. The Judge found that the...
Read More >>
Law Alerts • October 1, 2010
The impact of a pair of decisions issued by the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court in 2008, which vastly expanded the scope of governmental immunity to all claims, tort or contract, has been short lived. In Meyer, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in a..., Case Law Alert - 4t Qtr 2010
Read More >>
Law Alerts • October 1, 2010
The defendant appealed the denial of their motion for summary judgment premised upon the decisions in their favor in two prior Civil Service Commission hearings. In those hearings, the Civil Service Commission determined that the plaintiff's conduct..., Case Law Alert - 4th Qtr 2010
Read More >>
Law Alerts • October 1, 2010
The plaintiff, who is hearing impaired, filed suit under the ADA and NJLAD alleging she was denied service at the defendant's restaurant due to the presence of her service dog. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of the discrimination, she "..., Case Law Alert - 4th Qtr 2010
Read More >>
Articles • October 1, 2010
The Bulletin (Newsletter of ACE Group), October 2010
Read More >>
Law Alerts • October 1, 2010
The plaintiff, a teacher, alleged that after engaging in whistle-blowing activity, she was transferred to another school. This was not considered a demotion, and the plaintiff did not suffer any loss of salary or benefits. The court concluded that..., Case Law Alert - 4th Qtr 2010
Read More >>
Law Alerts • October 1, 2010
Following the claimant's work injury, a notice of compensation payable (NCP) was issued describing the injury. Five years after the NCP was issued, and four years after the claimant's benefits were suspended upon her return to work with no loss of...
Read More >>
Law Alerts • October 1, 2010
The plaintiff asserted that his employer failed to engage in the interactive process to address accommodating his disability and should have transferred him to a position that was within his qualifications and abilities. In rejecting the plaintiff's..., Case Law Alert - 4th Qtr 2010
Read More >>
Law Alerts • October 1, 2010
The plaintiff alleged that her former employer unlawfully terminated her employment because of her pregnancy, in violation of Title VII and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act. Prior to filing her lawsuit in federal court, the plaintiff had filed a..., Case Law Alert - 4th Qtr 2010
Read More >>
Law Alerts • October 1, 2010
In this case, following the claimant's work injury, the employer issued a Notice of Compensation Denial ("NCD"), indicating that investigation was ongoing, pending receipt of medical documentation. Later, the employer issued a corrected NCD,...
Read More >>

Pages

© 2013 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1

Please read the following disclaimer:

Thank you for your interest in our firm. The information contained on this Website contains statements, videos and other content about the type and quality of services offered by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, as well as past results and testimonials about the firm. This information has not been reviewed nor approved by the Florida Bar.

  • The facts and circumstances of your case may differ from the matters in which results and/or testimonials have been provided.
  • All results of cases handled by the firm are not provided and not all clients have given testimonials.
  • The results and testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by any individual attorney or by the firm nor of the experience of all clients or others with the firm. Every case is different, and each client's case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.


Please acknowledge that you have read the above disclaimer by clicking on one of the two links below.

YES I have read and understand the above statements. I am interested in learning more about Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. NO I do not want to view the information.

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."