Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Practice Area Articles

Start Date
E.g., 2013-06-18
End Date
E.g., 2013-06-18
State
Author
Practice Area
Keyword
Article Category

Pages

Law Alerts • April 11, 2013
The broker secured windstorm coverage for the condominium association through an insurance company. The association's condominium was damaged by hurricanes. It proceeded with expensive remediation efforts after the broker assured it that the..., Case Law Alerts - 2nd Quarter 2013
Read More >>
Law Alerts • April 11, 2013
This case involved a motion presented by the employer to the Board seeking permission for two of its fact witnesses to testify telephonically at the upcoming Board hearing rather than appearing live. Claimant's counsel was opposing this motion,..., Case Law Alerts - 2nd Quarter 2013
Read More >>
Law Alerts • April 11, 2013
The plaintiff, the tax collector of Weehawken, New Jersey, alleged that he was subjected to six acts of retaliation by his employers, the Township of Weehawken, its mayor and its town manager, after he submitted a certification in support of a civil..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Quarter 2013
Read More >>
Law Alerts • April 11, 2013
Before the court was the plaintiffs' appeal from an order granting summary judgment to their insurer, defendant New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company. The plaintiffs alleged that their insurer had acted in bad faith by failing to settle..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Quarter 2013
Read More >>
Law Alerts • April 11, 2013
The claimant settled his indemnity claim by Compromise and Release Agreement (C&R). The C&R that was approved by the Workers’ Compensation Judge described the injuries as "[a]ny and all injuries . . . including but not limited to..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Quarter 2013
Read More >>
Law Alerts • April 11, 2013
The plaintiff became aware of an accounting shortfall for a client that he monitored. When he brought the issue to a supervisor, he was told not to worry about it, but he was not given an explanation or reason. The plaintiff assumed the shortfall..., Case Law Alerts - 2nd Quarter 2013
Read More >>
Law Alerts • April 11, 2013
  The plaintiff was working at Albert Einstein Medical Center, setting up the OR for an emergency C-section, when she tried to remove the shield covering the blade of the Becton Dickinson and Co. (BD) plastic, disposable scalpel. When the..., Case Law Alerts - 2nd Quarter 2013
Read More >>
Law Alerts • April 11, 2013
The respondents were represented by Denis Dice and Joel Wertman of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin in a claim where the claimant sought damages for an alleged unsuitable recommendation of a variable annuity for the claimant's IRA..., Case Law Alerts - 2nd Quarter 2013
Read More >>
Law Alerts • April 11, 2013
Before the court were cross-motions for summary judgment involving a dispute over insurance coverage for a condominium unit that was damaged when a toilet inside it broke, allowing water to run throughout the unit. The plaintiffs owned a condominium..., Case Law Alerts - 2nd Quarter 2013
Read More >>
Law Alerts • April 11, 2013
A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority hearing panel ruled that Charles Schwab can prohibit its customers from bringing class action lawsuits. The panel said the ban violates FINRA's rules, but that those rules conflict with the Federal..., Case Law Alerts - 2nd Quarter 2013
Read More >>

Pages

© 2013 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1

Please read the following disclaimer:

Thank you for your interest in our firm. The information contained on this Website contains statements, videos and other content about the type and quality of services offered by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, as well as past results and testimonials about the firm. This information has not been reviewed nor approved by the Florida Bar.

  • The facts and circumstances of your case may differ from the matters in which results and/or testimonials have been provided.
  • All results of cases handled by the firm are not provided and not all clients have given testimonials.
  • The results and testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by any individual attorney or by the firm nor of the experience of all clients or others with the firm. Every case is different, and each client's case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.


Please acknowledge that you have read the above disclaimer by clicking on one of the two links below.

YES I have read and understand the above statements. I am interested in learning more about Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. NO I do not want to view the information.

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."