Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Practice Area Articles

Start Date
E.g., Mar 24, 2019
End Date
E.g., Mar 24, 2019
State
Author
Practice Area
Keyword
Article Category

Pages

Law Alerts April 1, 2019
Dominic Oliveira was employed as an interstate truck driver for New Prime, Inc. under an operating agreement that deemed him to be an independent contractor. Oliveria filed a class action suit, alleging the petitioner denied its drivers lawful wages..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2019 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Law Alerts March 20, 2019
Edited by Allison L. Krupp, Esq. Ohio Supreme Court Holds That General Contractor’s CGL Insurer Is Not Obligated to Defend Suit Alleging Subcontractor’s Faulty Workmanship   By David J. Fagnilli, Esq. In Ohio N...., The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. It is solely intended to provide information on recent legal developments, and is not intended to provide legal advice for a...
Law Alerts March 19, 2019
Edited by Timothy D. Rau, Esq. Equipment Manufacturers Liable for Replacement Parts Under Maritime Law, SCOTUS Says By Joshua Scheets, Esq.  and Carol Vanderwoude, Esq. The United States Supreme Court weighed in on the bare metal defense in..., The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. It is solely intended to provide information on recent legal developments, and is not intended to provide legal advice...
Mediation March 8, 2019
Defense Digest Article March 1, 2019
Defense Digest, Vol. 25, No. 1, March 2019 By Linda Wagner Farrell, Esq.* Key Points: Recent evidentiary order seeks to limit substantive content of ex parte conferences with authorized treating providers. Judge ruled the employer or..., Defense Digest, Vol. 25, No. 1, March 2019. Defense Digest is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Defense Digest Article March 1, 2019
Defense Digest, Vol. 25, No. 1, March 2019 By Daniel W. Deitrick, Esq.* Key Points: For purposes of subrogation under Section 319 of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act, the Supreme Court held that the future credit/..., Defense Digest, Vol. 25, No. 1, March 2019. Defense Digest is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Defense Digest Article March 1, 2019
Defense Digest, Vol. 25, No. 1, March 2019 By R. Anthony Michetti, Esq.* Your insured operates a bar, restaurant or hotel. A significant amount of revenue generated by the business is from the sale of alcohol. Through a license issued by the..., Defense Digest, Vol. 25, No. 1, March 2019. Defense Digest is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Defense Digest Article March 1, 2019
Defense Digest, Vol. 25, No. 1, March 2019 By Andrew T. Rhoads, Esq.* Key Points: Courts have issued conflicting decisions as to what constitutes bad faith. Two recent decisions of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of..., Defense Digest, Vol. 25, No. 1, March 2019. Defense Digest is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...

Pages

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."