Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Practice Area Articles

Start Date
E.g., Apr 19, 2019
End Date
E.g., Apr 19, 2019
State
Author
Practice Area
Keyword
Article Category

Pages

What's Hot in Worker's Comp May 1, 2019
Law Alerts April 17, 2019
Edited by Allison L. Krupp, Esq. PA Supreme Court to Review Superior Court’s Decision Overturning Trial Court’s Multi-Million Dollar Bad Faith Award By James P. Shay, Esq. In a significant development, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court..., The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. It is solely intended to provide information on recent legal developments, and is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific...
Law Alerts April 9, 2019
Edited by Allison L. Krupp, Esq. Connecticut Second Circuit Enforces Clear Policy Language Limiting the Extent of Collapse Coverage for Cracking Basement Walls By Daniel W. Levin, Esq. A panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled per..., The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. It is solely intended to provide information on recent legal developments, and is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific...
Mediation April 3, 2019
Law Alerts April 1, 2019
The district court certified a plaintiff class in the case but later reconsidered and decertified the class. Under Federal Rule 23(f), the named plaintiff would have had 14 days to seek review of that decertification order in the court of appeals...., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2019 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Law Alerts April 1, 2019
The mother of Brittany Oliver, a developmentally disabled person, appealed the trial court’s final order dismissing the second amended complaint with prejudice against the University of Miami School of Law’s Children & Youth Law..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2019 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Law Alerts April 1, 2019
The Superior Court rejected the plaintiff’s argument, holding that a metal pole used to strike a piñata is not a dangerous condition on the property. The pole broke while the plaintiff was using it to strike the piñata, causing..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2019 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Law Alerts April 1, 2019
After a four-day trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $5,000 on her retaliatory discharge claim brought under the NJLAD and $2,982.59 in lost wages. Plaintiff’s counsel then sought an award of legal fees of $360,588 and costs of $8,282.56. The..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2019 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Law Alerts April 1, 2019
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that the trial court properly sustained the preliminary objections filed by the tortfeasors. The court said its Domtar Paper decision does not support the proposition that an employer or workers’..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2019 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
What's Hot in Worker's Comp April 1, 2019

Pages

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."