Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure
State
Practice Department
Practice Area
Start Date
E.g., Nov, 2019
End Date
E.g., Nov, 2019
Keyword

Pages

Federal Employment Law October 1, 2017
The plaintiff was a substitute custodian in the employer’s school district. As a substitute custodian, she could obtain assignments at any school within the school district. In an effort to increase her hours, the plaintiff met with several..., Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Federal Employment Law October 1, 2017
The plaintiffs sought review of the dismissal of their age discrimination claims following the employer’s failure to hire them for full-time positions. In making its hiring decision, the employer utilized a standardized approach in which: (1)..., Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Federal Employment Law October 1, 2017
The plaintiff, an investigator with the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, alleged that her supervisors subjected her to harassment on the basis of her race and constructively discharged her, in violation of Title VII and the Americans with..., Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Federal Employment Law July 1, 2017
The district court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania was tasked to determine whether the plaintiff, who alleged that he was subjected to gay slurs and physically assaulted at the workplace, could sustain a Title VII claim premised upon sexual..., Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Federal Employment Law July 1, 2017
The court granted the employer’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s disability discrimination claim pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, finding that the impairment pled—a stomach problem—did not constitute a..., Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Pennsylvania Employment Law July 1, 2017
A jury awarded the plaintiff more than $20,000 in damages in connection with her claim that her former employer terminated her from a pharmacy technician position after it learned that she had been diagnosed with cancer, in violation of the..., Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Federal Employment Law April 1, 2017
In Fry, The United States Supreme Court vacated and remanded a decision that found the plaintiff failed to exhaust the Individuals with Disabilities Educational Act’s (IDEA) procedures prior to filing a lawsuit alleging violations of the..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Federal Employment Law April 1, 2017
The Third Circuit upheld the dismissal of the plaintiff’s FMLA retaliation claim, finding that the plaintiff could not demonstrate that his termination was pretextual in light of the employer’s honest belief that the plaintiff misused..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Federal Employment Law April 1, 2017
The Third Circuit was tasked to decide a certified question from the district court, namely, “Must a plaintiff plead and prove that he or she was objectively qualified for the position sought” in a failure-to-promote discrimination suit..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Federal Employment Law April 1, 2017
The Third Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiff’s disability discrimination claim, finding that the district court correctly determined that the plaintiff failed to satisfy her burden of establishing that she was disabled pursuant to..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...

Pages

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."