Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Where the sidewalk ends: residential property owners do not have absolute immunity when sidewalk injuries occur.

January 1, 2019
Cherry-Hernandez v. Ribeiro, No. A-2034-17, 2018 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2654 (App. Div. Dec. 4, 2018) (per curiam)

The plaintiff brought suit for personal injuries after she fell on the driveway and/or sidewalk of the defendant’s property, which she claimed was made of uneven and cracked asphalt. The defendant premised his motion for summary judgment on a New Jersey Supreme Court case that held a property owner is not liable for a hazardous condition on an abutting sidewalk if he does not create or exacerbate the dangerous condition. The lower court concluded the defendant was exempt from liability due to his status as a residential property owner and that having an asphalt driveway that intersects with a concrete sidewalk is not negligent per se. However, the New Jersey Appellate Division reversed and remanded, noting that a “residential property owner’s immunity for injuries caused by sidewalks abutting his or her property is not absolute.” On appeal, the court further found there were outstanding factual issues as to whether the defendant created or exacerbated a hazardous condition. This case should caution defense counsel that a residential property owner is not absolutely immune from sidewalk liability without an evaluation of the facts.


Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2019

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2019 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Erica J. Goldring
(973) 618-4125

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."