Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Third Circuit affirmed the summary judgment of the plaintiff’s Title VII race discrimination and ADEA age discrimination claims in a per curiam opinion.

January 1, 2019
McKinney v. Hackensack Meridian Health, Inc., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 29384 (3d. Cir. Oct. 18, 2018)

McKinney, who is African American and 64 years old, began working for Meridian Nursing & Rehab in 1999 as a nutritional services supervisor. She had worked the opening shift until April 2013, when it was decided that all nutritional services supervisors would take turns working both the opening and closing shifts. McKinney objected on the ground that she had always worked only the opening shift, and she told the defendant it was making this decision based on her race. The plaintiff’s race discrimination claim failed because all employees with the same job title as the plaintiff’s were required to cover the closing shift and the plaintiff worked fewer closing shifts than others. As the Third Circuit explained, the plaintiff failed to show an adverse employment action. It further noted that the record was devoid of circumstances that could give rise to an inference of unlawful discrimination. McKinney also complained about a July 2015 incident in which a patient with seafood allergies was served clam chowder when it was her duty to check patient trays. McKinney alleged she was picked on because of her race and recollected being called into a meeting to discuss this, where an assistant administrator yelled and pointed a finger at her. The court concluded that an isolated verbal reprimand, which did not result in disciplinary action, does not rise to the level of an adverse employment action. The Third Circuit also found that McKinney failed to establish an adverse action with respect to her ADEA claim because, although she asserted that younger employees were hired as supervisors, she did not explain how that affected her employment. 


Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2019

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2019 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."