Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Supreme Court clarifies time in which motion to vacate arbitration award must be served.

October 3, 2016
Cox v. Dayton Pub. Schools Bd. of Edn., Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5505, 2016 Ohio LEXIS 2107 (August 25, 2016)

An arbitrator appointed to settle a dispute over the termination of a teacher found that the termination was appropriate. The decision was emailed on December 10. On March 10 of the following year, the teacher moved in the court of common pleas to vacate the award. The clerk sent a copy of the motion to the school board on the same day, and on the following day, March 11, the teacher sent another copy of the motion to the board. The trial court dismissed the action for want of jurisdiction because the statute requires “[n]otice of a motion to vacate . . . an award must be served upon the adverse party or his attorney within three months after the award is delivered to the parties in interest, as prescribed by law for service of notice of a motion in an action.” R.C. 2711.13. The trial court agreed with the board that “notice” was not received within three months and so dismissed the case. The District Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court both disagreed, holding that the statute requires notice to be served within three months. The clerk’s sending of the motion via certified mail on March 10 was within three months of December 10, and so service was proper. Moreover, the usual method of calculating days for service—as expressly referenced in the statute—excludes the first day of the period. And so the Supreme Court concluded that the three-month clock began on December 11, making the teacher’s mailing of the motion again on March 11 timely.


Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2016. Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2016 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Shane Haselbarth
(215) 575-2639

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."