Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Municipal ordinance imposing a duty of care on property owner to maintain abutting public sidewalk does not automatically create a duty of care owed by property owner to a third party injured on the same sidewalk.

January 1, 2019
Reinhardt v. Gornowski, No. A-1395-17, 2018 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2582 (App. Div. Nov. 26, 2018) (per curiam)

The plaintiff claimed the defendant negligently maintained the public sidewalk abutting her property, which caused her to fall and suffer personal injuries. Specifically, the plaintiff alleged the sidewalk abutting the defendant’s property was uneven due to a tree root from a tree the defendant had planted on his front lawn. The defendant claimed he had only ever planted trees in his backyard. The motion judge granted summary judgment for the defendant, finding there was no evidence he planted a tree on his front lawn and the plaintiff’s theory of liability was speculative. The New Jersey Appellate Division affirmed, agreeing it is “well established” that the municipal ordinance at issue here was meant to ease the burden of local government, not to protect individual members of the public. Thus, where an ordinance imposes a duty of care in one realm, we, as defense counsel, must consider these policy reasons and argue the duty should be narrowly construed, as this case successfully demonstrates.

 

Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2019

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2019 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Erica J. Goldring
Associate
(973) 618-4125
ejgoldring@mdwcg.com

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."