Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Mentioning an expert medical advisor during opening/closing arguments does not establish timely request.

October 1, 2019
Frances Wilcox v. Publix and Publix Risk Management, No. 1D19-0076, decision date July 3, 2019, Claimant appealed ruling of Judge Walker (Panama City)

The Judge of Compensation Claims held that the claimant’s mention of an expert medical advisor (EMA) during opening and closing arguments did not constitute a timely request. Florida case law instructs that such requests must be made on a timely basis once a disagreement among the providers becomes known. In this case, a conflict in the medical evidence involving the claimant's hand and wrist occurred as of April 9, 2018, when Dr. Smith, the claimant’s IME doctor, disagreed in his deposition testimony with the February 1, 2018, deposition opinions of the authorized treating physician, Dr. Hoxie. With regard to the claimant’s shoulder, notwithstanding unequivocal opinions made by the authorized treating physician, Dr. Klassen, contained in the medical records, a disagreement with Dr. Smith was known as of October 24, 2018, when Dr. Klassen was deposed. This final medical deposition was taken three weeks before the final hearing, which the judge  found to be sufficient time for a motion to appoint an EMA to have been filed. On appeal, the First District Court of Appeals per curiam affirmed.


Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2019

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2019 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Linda Wagner Farrell
(904) 358-4224

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."