Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Judicial privilege does not bar statutory Dragonetti claim and common law abuse of process claim.

April 1, 2017
Freundlich & Littman, LLC v. Feierstein, __ A.3d __, 2017 PA Super 40, 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 116 (Feb. 27, 2017)

As always, this wrongful use of civil proceedings and abuse of process case arises from an underlying suit. In the underlying suit, the defendant filed a counterclaim against the plaintiff’s counsel, joining him as a party to the negligence suit. Here, the underlying plaintiff’s counsel is the plaintiff and sues the underlying defendant’s counsel under Dragonetti. The defense raised here was that the judicial privilege bars these claims because the actions taken in the underlying suit fall within the broadly drawn absolute immunity for communications issued in the regular course of legal proceedings. The trial court agreed, holding that the judicial privilege covers all litigation behavior, including tortious behavior. In this precedential opinion, the Superior Court disagreed, holding that the Dragonetti Act and common law abuse of process claim each separately imposes liability for actions taken without probable cause and for an improper purpose. Immunity provided by the judicial privilege seeks to protect the legal process, but “[i]ndividuals who bring lawsuits for malicious motive and lacking probable cause, or that use the legal process for an illegitimate end after a suit has been initiated, are not seeking the ascertainment of truth or to encourage candor from witnesses.” Thus, the privilege has its limits.

 

Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2017

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2017 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Shane Haselbarth
Shareholder
(215) 575-2639
sshaselbarth@mdwcg.com

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."