Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

First DCA reverses on jurisdictional issue after maximum medical improvement.

April 1, 2019
Marraffino v. Stericycle/Sedgwick CMS, 1D18-2639 (Fla 1st DCA Nov. 30, 2018)

In a prior order that was pending on appeal, the judge of compensation claims determined the claimant was at maximum medical improvement. The order on appeal concerned claims for temporary partial disability benefits, which the judge dismissed, specifically finding that he lacked jurisdiction to consider such claims because of the previous maximum medical improvement finding on appeal. The claimant conceded that any temporary partial disability claims for periods prior to the disputed maximum medical improvement date were properly dismissed. However, for periods after that improvement date, the claimant argued the judge continued to have jurisdiction. The First District Court of Appeals agreed and reversed the judge’s finding. The court held that jurisdiction over benefits concerning a different time frame remained with the judge, notwithstanding the appeal of the disputed maximum medical improvement date. The judge had erroneously relied on the faulty premise that once a claimant reached maximum medical improvement, he would forever stay at maximum medical improvement.


Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2019

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2019 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Linda Wagner Farrell
(904) 358-4224

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."