Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Court declines to broaden the scope of bystander liability in strict product liability action.

January 3, 2017
D’Antonio v. FMC Techs., Inc., No. 16-cv-703, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135390 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 30, 2016)

The plaintiff in this strict liability action was a truck driver who was injured by a product while preparing it for delivery to the ultimate buyer. He brought suit against the product’s manufacturer, alleging it did not meet consumer expectations, failed the risk utility test and did not contain adequate warnings. The manufacturer countered that the plaintiff could not recover under strict liability because he was not the “ultimate user or consumer” of the product, as required by the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A. In granting the manufacturer’s motion to dismiss, the court concluded that the plaintiff was not a “user or consumer” because “[h]e was not ‘utilizing’ the product ‘for the purpose of doing work upon it,’ and his employer . . . was not the ‘ultimate buyer’ of the product.” The court further noted that, although the Pennsylvania Superior Court and federal district courts have at times allowed bystanders to recover under strict liability claims, none of those cases allowed for recovery “by persons who load or unload items during the course of their transportation to consumers.” In declining to broaden the scope of recovery, the court explained that “strict liability is designed to protect users and consumers (and perhaps those who might be in close proximity to them), not the people who help bring a product to market.”


Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2017. Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2017 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

(267) 295-4032

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."