Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Complaint seeking exoneration from or limitation of liability denied where petitioner was on board a recreational vessel and personally participated in negligent act of overloading said vessel.

January 15, 2016
In the Matter of the Complaint of Kevin Treanor, As Owner of the Kandi Won, A 34 Foot, Silverton, Recreational Vessel, for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153954 (E.D.N.Y. 2015)

On November 6, 2015, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York denied the petitioner’s complaint seeking exoneration from or limitation of liability for the July 4, 2012, capsizing of his recreational vessel, the Kandi Won, which resulted in the drowning of three young children. The court, after employing the two-step analysis in maritime limitation of liability actions pursuant to the Shipowner’s Limitation of Liability Act, granted the dismissal motions of the claimants, Gaines and Silverton. Under the first step, the court found that the claimants met their burden of proving, by a preponderance of evidence, that the petitioner was negligent, namely, that the petitioner’s actions in allowing his vessel to become overloaded with 27 guests constituted a substantial factor contributing to the capsizing. Under the second step, after a finding of negligence on the part of the petitioner—which shifts the burden to the petitioner to prove a “lack of privity or knowledge”—the court held that the petitioner failed to satisfy his burden in view of the fact that he was on board the vessel at the time of the incident and personally participated in the negligent act of overloading the vessel by inviting or allowing the 27 guests to board the vessel. Importantly, the court limited its findings based upon the petitioner’s actions and inaction and did not render any adverse findings against Silverton, the vessel manufacturer, whom we represented in this proceeding.

Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2016

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2016 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

(856) 675-3606

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."