Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Lauren M. Burnette

Associate
4200 Crums Mill Road
Suite B
Harrisburg, PA 17112
(717) 651-3703
(717) 651-9630 - Fax
lmburnette@mdwcg.com

Lauren is a member of the firm's Professional Liability department, where she concentrates her practice on the defense of creditors' rights, licensed professionals, and insurers.  Lauren's experience and familiarity with overlapping areas of practice have made her particularly successful in not only obtaining favorable outcomes in traditional litigation, but in identifying potential risks and resolving claims on a pre-litigation basis.  Lauren is a member of the Pennsylvania Bar Association's sub-committee on Professional Responsibility and Ethics, and is a frequent presenter of the Pennsylvania Bar Association's malpractice avoidance seminar.  Lauren has extensive experience in both state and federal court at both trial and appellate levels, and represents clients throughout Pennsylvania and Maryland.

Lauren's previous professional experience includes the representation of medical professionals and hospitals.  She has successfully defended medical malpractice cases to defense verdicts, and has also assisted in the development and implementation of risk management policies and procedures for physician practice groups.

Lauren is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Pittsburgh School of Law.  While earning her juris doctor, Lauren was a participant in the University of Pittsburgh's Alternative Dispute Resolution practicum, during which she served as an intern in the Pittsburgh Area Office of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.  

Significant Representative Matters

  • Gonyo v. Midland Funding, LLC, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90716 (D. Md. 2012) (Plaintiff/Debtor's pre-petition FDCPA claim dismissed for lack of standing due to Plaintiff'/Debtor's failure to schedule claim as an asset.)

  • Antar v. The Mike Egan Insurance Agency, et. al., 58 A.3d 609 (Md. App. 2012) (Plaintiffs' negligence claims against insurance agency dismissed as time-barred after finding that the three-year statute of limitations was not tolled during the pendency of Plaintiffs' prior identical lawsuit in Pennsylvania.)

  • Byrd v. Midland Credit Management, Inc., No. 1001-0000153-2012 (District Court of Maryland for Howard County) (Defense verdict entered following trial of Plaintiff's claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act.)

  • Wagner v. Knapp v. Spencer, Gleason, Hebe & Rague, No. 1169-CV-2008 (C.P. Tioga) (Defendants' claims that Additional Defendant law firm was negligent in its preparation of deeds of sale dismissed as time-barred due to Defendants'' failure to exercise reasonable diligence by reading the deeds prior to signing.)

  • Snoke v. Anderson, No. 03-3715 (C.P. Cumberland) (Following defense verdict as to Plaintiffs' premises liability claims, Plaintiffs' post-trial motion seeking new trial denied after the Court agreed with Defendants' argument that Plaintiffs failed to preserve their objection to purportedly flawed jury instruction by failing to make sufficiently specific objection during trial.)

  • Javaid v. Weiss, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145513 (M.D. Pa. 2011) (Plaintiff's professional negligence and breach of contract claims against his former attorney were insufficiently specific to survive motion to dismiss.)

  • Salvadia v. Ashbrook, et. al., 2007 PA Super 108 (2007) (Dismissal of Plaintiffs' claims affirmed where parents, who filed claims individually and as parents of their minor daughter, failed to take out letters of administration following their minor daughter's death, thus requiring the abadement of the action pursuant to 20 Pa.C.S. §3375.)

Published Works

  • "In Order to Pursue, Plaintiffs Must First Plead: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Reigns in Sua Sponte Validation of Unpled Claims," Defense Digest, Vol. 15, No. 3, September 2009

  • "Maryland Court of Appeals Thaws Assumption of the Risk Standard in Black Ice Cases," Defense Digest, Vol. 18, No. 1, March 2012

  • "Maryland's Pit Bull Ruling Puts Landlords, Insurers In The Doghouse," Defense Digest, Vol.18, No. 3, September 2012

  • "A Full and Final Release?" Defense Digest, Vol. 19, No. 1, March 2013

Classes/Seminars Taught

  • "Prosecution and Defense of Legal Malpractice Claims," Dauphin County Bar Association, 2008

  • Pennsylvania Bar Association Avoiding Legal Malpractice Seminar, 2010 - 2013

Education

  • University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2003 J.D. 

  • University of Pennsylvania, 2000 B.A. 

Defense Digest Article March 1, 2013
By Lauren M. Burnette, Esq.*   Key Points: Maryland's Court of Special Appeals holds that a release which includes language releasing the tortfeasor and "all other persons, firms or corporations" does not release the..., Defense Digest, Vol. 19, No. 1, March 2013
Law Alerts October 1, 2012
The plaintiffs Mabel and Cris Smith, mother and son, filed a professional negligence claim against two lawyers, Gerald Morrison and Scott Morrison, claiming that the attorneys breached their fiduciary duties to Mabel and Cris by simultaneously..., Case Law Alert - 4th Qtr 2012
Defense Digest Article September 1, 2012
Key Points: Maryland's highest court concludes that pit bulls and cross-bred pit bulls are "inherently dangerous" animals. Under new standard, owners of pit bulls, landlords and property owners are strictly liable for the..., Defense Digest, Vol. 18, No. 3, September 2012
Defense Digest Article March 1, 2012
Maryland – Civil Practice/Assumption of the Risk Key Points: Maryland’s highest court has overturned past precedent concerning application of the defense of assumption of the risk to snow and ice slip and fall cases....
Law Alerts October 1, 2011
The plaintiff Nicholas Knopick appealed from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Philip A. Downey, Esquire. The plaintiff retained Downey to file a legal..., Case Law Alert - 4th Qtr 2011
Law Alerts October 1, 2011
The plaintiffs Peter and Judith Papadoplos filed a professional negligence claim against their former attorney and his firm after Attorney Ronca failed to timely file a civil claim against either the hospital or manufacturer of a medical device..., Case Law Alert - 4th Qtr 2011
Defense Digest Article September 1, 2009
Pennsylvania - Civil Procedure , The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently tempered the ability of courts to search a plaintiff's complaint for the existence of a cause of action - even one not raised by the plaintiff himself - for the purpose of determining that the plaintiff..., Defense Digest, Vol. 15, No. 3, September 2009

Education

  • University of Pittsburgh School of Law (J.D., 2003)
  • University of Pennsylvania (B.A., 2000)

Bar Admissions

  • Pennsylvania, 2004
  • U.S District Court Western District of Pennsylvania, 2004
  • U.S. District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania, 2006
  • U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit, 2007
  • Maryland, 2010
  • U.S. District Court District of Maryland, 2010
  • U.S. Court of Appeals 4th Circuit, 2012

Associations & Memberships

  • ACA International
  • ACA Members' Attorney Program
  • Dauphin County Bar Association
  • Pennsylvania Bar Association
  • PBA Professional Liability Committee
  • Maryland State Bar Association

Honors & Awards

  • Pennsylvania Super Lawyer Rising Star, 2013

Year Joined Organization: 2008

Please read the following disclaimer:

Thank you for your interest in our firm. The information contained on this Website contains statements, videos and other content about the type and quality of services offered by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, as well as past results and testimonials about the firm. This information has not been reviewed nor approved by the Florida Bar.

  • The facts and circumstances of your case may differ from the matters in which results and/or testimonials have been provided.
  • All results of cases handled by the firm are not provided and not all clients have given testimonials.
  • The results and testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by any individual attorney or by the firm nor of the experience of all clients or others with the firm. Every case is different, and each client's case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.


Please acknowledge that you have read the above disclaimer by clicking on one of the two links below.

YES I have read and understand the above statements. I am interested in learning more about Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. NO I do not want to view the information.

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."